Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20458350›Full record

Trial reportClinical interventions in aging2010

Alendronate improves QOL of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Hisaya Kawate, Keizo Ohnaka, Masahiro Adachi, Suminori Kono, Hideyuki Ikematsu, Hisashi Matsuo, Kazumi Higuchi, Takehiko Takayama, Ryoichi Takayanagi

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical interventions in aging, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Alendronate is more effective than elcatonin in improving pain and quality of life in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2011
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hisaya KawateDepartment of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, and Internal Medicine, Haradoi Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan. kawate@intmed3.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp
Keizo Ohnaka
Masahiro Adachi
Suminori Kono
Hideyuki Ikematsu
Hisashi Matsuo
Kazumi Higuchi
Takehiko Takayama
Ryoichi Takayanagi
Kyushu University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePostmenopausal osteoporosis causes bone fracture as well as pain, physical, psychological and socially adverse effects, which affects a patient's quality of life (QOL). The effect of alendronate on QOL was investigated compared with that of alfacalcidol in post-menopausal osteoporotic women. PATIENTS AND

methodsA total of 44 postmenopausal osteoporotic women (mean age 69.8 years) with back or joint pain, although capable of walking, were randomly assigned to two groups; group A (n=25) received 5 mg/day of alendronate, and group B (n=19) received 0.5 microg/day of alfacalcidol, for the first 4 months. For the following 2 months, the group A received 0.5 microg/day of alfacalcidol and the group B received 5 mg/day of alendronate in a crossover design. The patient's QOL was evaluated by score of Japanese Osteoporosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (JOQOL), and pain intensity using a visual analog scale (VAS). Bone metabolism was measured by bone mineral density (BMD) and a biomarker for bone resorption, urinary crosslinked N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX).

resultsWith 4-month treatment, alendronate, but not alfacalcidol, improved pain-related QOL, reduced joint pain by VAS, and increased bone mineral density. Both treatments significantly reduced bone resorption, the inhibition was significantly higher with alendronate (-56.5%) compared with alfacalcidol (-18.1%). After crossover, the patients in group A received alfacalcidol and had a reduced total and daily living activity-related QOL scores, and increased upper back pain by VAS. The group B received alendronate had significantly reduced bone resorption after the 2 months.

conclusionAlendronate improves the QOL of Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis by reducing pain intensity as well as increasing bone mineral density.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overAlendronateBone Density Conservation AgentsFemaleHumansJapanMiddle AgedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalSurveys and QuestionnairesAlendronateBone Density Conservation Agentsbisphosphonatesosteoporosispainquality of lifevitamin D

Identifiers

PMID20458350
PMCPMC2861847
OpenAlexW1963899208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.