Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20458085›Full record

Trial reportArchives of internal medicine2010

Proton pump inhibitors for prophylaxis of nosocomial upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding: effect of standardized guidelines on prescribing practice.

Patrick S Yachimski, Elizabeth A Farrell, Daniel P Hunt, Andrea E Reid

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of internal medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Attitude and knowledge of Saudi community pharmacists towards use of proton pump inhibitors.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2019
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review of Proton Pump Inhibitor Overuse in the US Veteran Population.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patrick S YachimskiGastrointestinal Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. patrick.yachimski@vanderbilt.edu
Elizabeth A Farrell
Daniel P Hunt
Andrea E Reid
Harvard University · US

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND NUTRITIONT32DK007191 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI RAYMOND T CHUNG · 1986 to 2026
$14.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are frequently prescribed for prophylaxis of nosocomial upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Some inpatients receiving PPIs may have no risk factors for nosocomial upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding, and PPIs may be continued unnecessarily at hospital discharge. We aimed to assess the effect of standardized guidelines on PPI prescribing practices.

methodsGuidelines for PPI use were implemented on the medical service at a tertiary center. We reviewed PPI use among inpatient admissions during the month before implementation of guidelines and then prospectively evaluated PPI use among admissions during the month after implementation of guidelines.

resultsAmong an overall cohort of 942 patients, 48% were prescribed PPIs while inpatients, and 41% were prescribed PPIs at hospital discharge. Univariate predictors of inpatient PPI use included age, length of hospital stay, history of gastroesophageal reflux disease or upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding, and outpatient PPI, aspirin, or glucocorticoid use. Among patients not on an outpatient regimen of PPIs at admission, implementation of guidelines resulted in lower rates of inpatient PPI use (27% before vs 16% after, P = .001) and PPI prescription at discharge (16% before vs 10% after, P = .03).

conclusionIntroduction of standardized guidelines resulted in lower rates of PPI use among a subset of inpatients and reduced the rate of PPI prescriptions at discharge.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherencePractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'BostonFemaleGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansInpatientsLogistic ModelsMaleMedical Staff, HospitalMiddle AgedPeptic Ulcer HemorrhageProspective StudiesProton Pump InhibitorsProton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID20458085
PMCPMC3758922
OpenAlexW2086009722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.