Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20457864›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2010

Retinal synaptic pathways underlying the response of the rabbit local edge detector.

Thomas L Russell, Frank S Werblin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evolutionary aspects of reservoir computing.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  7. Synaptic Contributions to Receptive Field Structure and Response Properties in the Rodent Lateral Geniculate Nucleus of the Thalamus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Functional Circuitry of the Retina.Annual review of vision science · 2015
    Article
  10. The Synaptic and Morphological Basis of Orientation Selectivity in a Polyaxonal Amacrine Cell of the Rabbit Retina.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Broad thorny ganglion cells: a candidate for visual pursuit error signaling in the primate retina.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  16. GABAergic neurotransmission and retinal ganglion cell function.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2015
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas L RussellDivision of Neurobiology, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-3200, USA.
Frank S Werblin

Funding

Push-pull Interactions Between ON and OFF Bipolar, Amacrine and Ganglion cellsR01EY015512 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI WERBLIN, FRANK S · 2005 to 2011
$2.5M
NEI NIH HHS EY-015512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We studied the circuitry that underlies the behavior of the local edge detector (LED) retinal ganglion cell in rabbit by measuring the spatial and temporal properties of excitatory and inhibitory currents under whole cell voltage clamp. Previous work showed that LED excitation is suppressed by activity in the surround. However, the contributions of outer and inner retina to this characteristic and the neurotransmitters used are currently unknown. Blockage of retinal inhibitory pathways (GABA(A), GABA(C), and glycine) eliminated edge selectivity. Inverting gratings in the surround with 50-microm stripe sizes did not stimulate horizontal cells, but suppressed on and off excitation by roughly 60%, indicating inhibition of bipolar terminals (feedback inhibition). On pharmacologic blockage, we showed that feedback inhibition used both GABA(A) and GABA(C) receptors, but not glycine. Glycinergic inhibition suppressed GABAergic feedback inhibition in the center, enabling larger excitatory currents in response to luminance changes. Excitation, feedback inhibition, and direct (feedforward) inhibition responded to luminance-neutral flipping gratings of 20- to 50-microm widths, showing they are driven by independent subunits within their receptive fields, which confers sensitivity to borders between areas of texture and nontexture. Feedforward inhibition was glycinergic, its rise time was faster than decay time, and did not function to delay spiking at the onset of a stimulus. Both the on and off phases could be triggered by luminance shifts as short in duration as 33 ms and could be triggered during scenes that already produced a high baseline level of feedforward inhibition. Our results show how LED circuitry can use subreceptive field sensitivity to detect visual edges via the interaction between excitation and feedback inhibition and also respond to rapid luminance shifts within a rapidly changing scene by producing feedforward inhibition.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsFeedback, PhysiologicalGABA-A Receptor AntagonistsIn Vitro TechniquesNeural InhibitionNeural PathwaysNeuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesPhotic StimulationRabbitsReceptors, GABAReceptors, GABA-AReceptors, GlycineRetinaRetinal Bipolar CellsGABA-A Receptor AntagonistsGABA-C receptorReceptors, GABAReceptors, GABA-AReceptors, Glycine

Identifiers

PMID20457864
PMCPMC2867570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.