Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20456674›Full record

Trial reportTransfusion2010

An adapted postdonation motivational interview enhances blood donor retention.

Kadian S Sinclair, Tavis S Campbell, Patricia M Carey, Eric Langevin, Brent Bowser, Christopher R France

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Transfusion, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02075099 (Evaluation of the Efficiency of a Hydration by Isotonic Solution With or Without Muscular Exercise of the Fainting Whole Blood Donors), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02075099 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Efficiency of a Hydration by Isotonic Solution With or Without Muscular Exercise of the Fainting Whole Blood Donors

TypeinterventionalSponsorEtablissement Français du SangRan2014 to 2014Enrolled4,825ConditionsFainting, Presyncope, Syncopal EpisodeArmstensing exercises, No tensing exercises
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kadian S SinclairOhio University, Athens, Ohio, USA.
Tavis S Campbell
Patricia M Carey
Eric Langevin
Brent Bowser
Christopher R France
Ohio University · USUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

Preventing Adverse Reactions in Novice Blood DonorsR01HL077438 · NHLBI · OHIO UNIVERSITY ATHENS · PI FRANCE, CHRISTOPHER R · 2006 to 2010
$1.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL077438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlood donors may hold conflicting thoughts about future donation. While they may perceive the direct benefit to themselves and others, they often report compelling reasons not to give again. As a result the standard encouragements to return may not be sufficient to motivate some donors. This study examined the effects of a postdonation adapted motivational interview (AMI) on blood donor attitudes and repeat donation behavior. STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsDonors (n = 215) were randomly assigned to either an AMI or a no-interview control group. Approximately 1 month after their index donation, donors in the AMI group completed a brief telephone interview to clarify individual-specific motivations and values concerning blood donation and address potential barriers. They were then asked to complete questionnaires regarding donation attitudes, anxiety, self-efficacy, and intention to donate. Donors in the control group were also contacted 1 month after donation and asked to complete the same series of questionnaires.

resultsDonors in the AMI group reported greater intention to provide a future donation (F = 8.13, p < 0.05), more positive donation attitudes (F = 4.59, p < 0.05), and greater confidence in their ability to avoid adverse reactions (F = 10.26, p < 0.01). Further, AMI was associated with higher rates of attempted donation at 12 months (odds ratio, 2.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-4.87).

conclusionApplication of an AMI may be an effective strategy to increase the donor pool by enhancing retention of existing donors.

Indexed as

Interviews as TopicMotivationAdolescentAdultAgedAttitudeBlood DonorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID20456674
PMCPMC2948616
OpenAlexW1915171083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.