ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2010
Safety aspects of subcutaneous immunotherapy with multiple allergens--a retrospective analysis on polysensitized patients.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decision-making for pediatric allergy immunotherapy for aeroallergens: a narrative review.European journal of pediatrics · 2019Review
- E. coli Nissle 1917 is a safe mucosal delivery vector for a birch-grass pollen chimera to prevent allergic poly-sensitization.Mucosal immunology · 2019Article
- Tolerability of an Immunologically Enhanced Subcutaneous Immunotherapy Preparation in Patients Treated with Concomitant Allergy Immunotherapy: A Non-Interventional Observational Study.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2017Article
- Tolerability of the SQ-standardised grass sublingual immunotherapy tablet in patients treated with concomitant allergy immunotherapy: a non-interventional observational study.Clinical and translational allergy · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polysensitization against a multitude of different allergens is a common problem in the treatment of allergies with specific immunotherapy (SIT). The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the risk of simultaneous administration of two allergen extracts during SIT with a conventional or Cluster regimen. Local (LR) and systemic reactions (SR) in 147 patients receiving different forms of SIT were compared. Patients received a total number of 2,758 injections during dose-increase phase and 3,412 injections during maintenance phase. During dose-increase phase, a higher rate of LR (for 1A 0.7% and for 2A 1.5%) was found with parallel injections of two allergen extracts (2A). The increase of SR was, however, not significant with conventional (for 1A 0% and for 2A 0.3%) or Cluster therapy (for 1A 0.3% and for 2A 0.5%). No increment of SR with injections of two allergen extracts did occur during maintenance phase (for 1A 0.3% and for 2A 0.1%). In conclusion, the results of the present study indicate that a higher rate of LR and SR must be considered during dose-increase phase independent of the kind of induction regime used. The rate of adverse events (AE) with two different allergen extracts, however, seems tolerable. After reaching maintenance phase, a higher rate of AE with parallel allergen injections did not occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.