Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20454796›Full record

ArticlePediatric surgery international2010

Gastrostomy complications in infants and children: a comparative study.

Robert Thomas Peters, Bram Balduyck, Shawqui Nour

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robert Thomas PetersDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, LE1 5WW, UK. rtp199@doctors.org.uk
Bram Balduyck
Shawqui Nour
Leicester Royal Infirmary · GBGlenfield Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGastrostomy is a commonly undertaken procedure in children. Methods for gastrostomy insertion have evolved and laparoscopy is commonly used to aid its insertion. The aim of this study is to review the outcome and complications of laparoscopic-assisted gastrostomy insertion.

methodsA retrospective case note review of children undergoing gastrostomy insertion by a single surgeon from 1999 to 2007.

results114 children underwent gastrostomy insertion, 68 males and 46 females, with a median age of 55 months (IQR 28-149 months). The majority were neurologically impaired. 98 underwent laparoscopic-assisted PEG (86%), 1 was converted to open procedure (0.9%) and 16 had standard PEG (14%). Median follow-up was 10.5 months with 90 children having their original gastrostomy changed to a button at a median interval of 7.4 months. Complications observed included new or deteriorating gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) (n = 16), infection (n = 9), granulation tissue (n = 11), tube dislodgement (n = 2) and intra-abdominal leakage of feed (n = 2). There were two gastrocolic fistulae which occurred in the standard PEG group.

conclusionThe inadvertent formation of a gastrocolic fistula was avoided with the use of laparoscopy to aid PEG insertion.

Indexed as

ChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastric FistulaGastrostomyHumansInfantIntestinal FistulaLaparoscopyMalePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID20454796
OpenAlexW1991256773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.