ArticleAnimal behaviour2010
Genotype effect on regulation of behaviour by vitellogenin supports reproductive origin of honeybee foraging bias.
Article in Animal behaviour, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome Evolution in Social Insects.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Review
- Variation in behavioural maturation in tropical honey bees corresponds with hormonal and molecular differences.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026Article
- RME-1-associated recycling endosomes participate in vitellogenin secretion inLife metabolism · 2025Article
- AI-enhanced marker-assisted selection concept for the multifunctional honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidea) protein Vitellogenin (Vg).Journal of economic entomology · 2025Article
- Evidence for vitellogenin DNA-binding in honey bees.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- Selection and validation of RT-qPCR reference genes for multi-tissue gene expression normalization in two honeybee subspecies across post-emergence developmental stages.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Honey bee functional genomics using symbiont-mediated RNAi.Nature protocols · 2023Review
- Viral species differentially influence macronutrient preferences based on honey bee genotype.Biology open · 2022Article
- Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of honeybee brains identifies vitellogenin as caste differentiation-related factor.iScience · 2022Article
- Societies to genes: can we get there from here?Genetics · 2021Article
- Social networks predict the life and death of honey bees.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Host Genotype and Tissue Type Determine DWV Infection Intensity.Frontiers in insect science · 2021Article
- Article
- Insulin Receptor Substrate Gene Knockdown Accelerates Behavioural Maturation and Shortens Lifespan in Honeybee Workers.Insects · 2019Article
- lncRNA profile of Apis mellifera and its possible role in behavioural transition from nurses to foragers.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Article
- Honeybee rebel workers invest less in risky foraging than normal workers.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Article
- Extended evolution: A conceptual framework for integrating regulatory networks and niche construction.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In honeybee colonies, food collection is performed by a group of mostly sterile females called workers. After an initial nest phase, workers begin foraging for nectar and pollen, but tend to bias their collection towards one or the other. The foraging choice of honeybees is influenced by vitellogenin (vg), an egg-yolk precursor protein that is expressed although workers typically do not lay eggs. The forager reproductive ground plan hypothesis (RGPH) proposes an evolutionary path in which the behavioural bias toward collecting nectar or pollen on foraging trips is influenced by variation in reproductive physiology, such as hormone levels and vg gene expression. Recently, the connections between vg and foraging behaviour were challenged by Oldroyd and Beekman (2008), who concluded from their study that the ovary, and especially vg, played no role in foraging behaviour of bees. We address their challenge directly by manipulating vg expression by RNA interference- (RNAi) mediated gene knockdown in two honeybee genotypes with different foraging behaviour and reproductive physiology. We show that the effect of vg on the food-loading decisions of the workers occurs only in the genotype where timing of foraging onset (by age) is also sensitive to vg levels. In the second genotype, changing vg levels do not affect foraging onset or bias. The effect of vg on workers' age at foraging onset is explained by the well-supported double repressor hypothesis (DHR), which describes a mutually inhibitory relationship between vg and juvenile hormone (JH) - an endocrine factor that influences development, reproduction, and behaviour in many insects. These results support the RGPH and demonstrate how it intersects with an established mechanism of honeybee behavioural control.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.