Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20453865›Full record

ArticleNature methods2010

A photoconvertible reporter of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in vivo.

Geert Hamer, Olli Matilainen, Carina I Holmberg

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. ConsideringCells · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Proteasomal subunit depletions differentially affect germline integrity inFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  8. Observing and Quantifying Fluorescent Reporters.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The proteostasis network and its decline in ageing.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. A Practical Review of Proteasome Pharmacology.Pharmacological reviews · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Geert HamerMolecular Cancer Biology Program and Institute for Biomedicine, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Olli Matilainen
Carina I Holmberg
University of Helsinki · FIInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) orchestrates many cellular and tissue-specific processes by degrading damaged and key regulatory proteins. To enable investigation of UPS activity in different cell types in a living animal, we developed a photoconvertible fluorescent UPS reporter system for live imaging and quantification of protein degradation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Our reporter consists of the photoconvertible fluorescent protein Dendra2 targeted for proteasomal degradation by fusion to the UbG76V mutant form of ubiquitin. In contrast to previous reporters, this system permits quantification of UPS activity independently of protein synthesis. Our reporter revealed that UPS-mediated protein degradation varies in a cell type-specific and age-dependent manner in C. elegans.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsDopaminegamma-Aminobutyric AcidLuminescent ProteinsMicroscopy, FluorescenceProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearRNA InterferenceUbiquitinCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsDopaminegamma-Aminobutyric AcidLuminescent ProteinsProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearRPN-10 protein, C elegansUbiquitin

Identifiers

PMID20453865
OpenAlexW1980652019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.