Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20452218›Full record

ReviewTrends in microbiology2010

Impact of recombination on bacterial evolution.

Xavier Didelot, Martin C J Maiden

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 208 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
208citing papers in PubMed
16.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

208 citing papers in PubMed, 380 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. BeyondEmerging microbes & infections · 2026
    Article
  2. Whole-Genome Sequencing ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Phenotypic, Genetic, and Virulence Characterization ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genomic and patient epidemiology ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

148 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xavier DidelotDepartment of Statistics, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. x.didelot@warwick.ac.uk
Martin C J Maiden
University of Oxford · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 087622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic exchange plays a defining role in the evolution of many bacteria. The recent accumulation of nucleotide sequence data from multiple members of diverse bacterial genera has facilitated comparative studies that have revealed many features of this process. Here we focus on genetic exchange that has involved homologous recombination and illustrate how nucleotide sequence data have furthered our understanding of: (i) the frequency of recombination; (ii) the impact of recombination in different parts of the genome; and (iii) patterns of gene flow within bacterial populations. Summarizing the results obtained for a range of bacteria, we survey evidence indicating that the extent and nature of recombination vary widely among microbiological species and often among lineages assigned to the same microbiological species. These results have important implications in studies ranging from epidemiological investigations to examination of the bacterial species problem.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularRecombination, GeneticBacteriaGene Flow

Identifiers

PMID20452218
PMCPMC3985120
OpenAlexW2060737229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.