Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20449646›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2010

Cytogenetic map of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.).

Artur Fonsêca, Joana Ferreira, Tiago Ribeiro Barros dos Santos, Magdalena Mosiolek, Elisa Bellucci, James Kami, Paul Gepts, Valérie Geffroy, Dieter Schweizer, Karla G B dos Santos and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Chromosome and Genome Diversity in the GenusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Oligo-FISH barcode in beans: a new chromosome identification system.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Variation in Ribosomal DNA in the GenusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Breaks of macrosynteny and collinearity among moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia), cowpea (V. unguiculata), and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2020
    Article
  14. Multiple and independent rearrangements revealed by comparative cytogenetic mapping in the dysploid Leptostachyus group (Phaseolus L., Leguminosae).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2020
    Article
  15. Diversity of repetitive sequences within compact genomes of Phaseolus L. beans and allied genera Cajanus L. and Vigna Savi.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2020
    Article
  16. Characterization and Analysis of the Mitochondrial Genome of Common Bean (International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Identification of passion fruit (Passiflora edulis) chromosomes using BAC-FISH.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 7 countries.

Artur FonsêcaLaboratory of Plant Cytogenetics, Department of Botany, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, 50670-420, Brazil.
Joana Ferreira
Tiago Ribeiro Barros dos Santos
Magdalena Mosiolek
Elisa Bellucci
James Kami
Paul Gepts
Valérie Geffroy
Dieter Schweizer
Karla G B dos Santos
Andrea Pedrosa-Harand
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRGregor Mendel Institute of Molecular Plant Biology · ATUniversity of California, Davis · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRNational Institute of Agricultural Botany · GBUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A cytogenetic map of common bean was built by in situ hybridization of 35 bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) selected with markers mapping to eight linkage groups, plus two plasmids for 5S and 45S ribosomal DNA and one bacteriophage. Together with three previously mapped chromosomes (chromosomes 3, 4, and 7), 43 anchoring points between the genetic map and the cytogenetic map of the species are now available. Furthermore, a subset of four BAC clones was proposed to identify the 11 chromosome pairs of the standard cultivar BAT93. Three of these BACs labelled more than a single chromosome pair, indicating the presence of repetitive DNA in their inserts. A repetitive distribution pattern was observed for most of the BACs; for 38% of them, highly repetitive pericentromeric or subtelomeric signals were observed. These distribution patterns corresponded to pericentromeric and subtelomeric heterochromatin blocks observed with other staining methods. Altogether, the results indicate that around half of the common bean genome is heterochromatic and that genes and repetitive sequences are intermingled in the euchromatin and heterochromatin of the species.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingCytogenetic AnalysisEuchromatinFabaceaeGenome, PlantHeterochromatinRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidEuchromatinHeterochromatin

Identifiers

PMID20449646
PMCPMC2886897
OpenAlexW2143063275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.