ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2010
Computer-based assessment of cognitive functions in brain tumor patients.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05331521 (Improvement of Functional Outcome for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Grade 2 or 3 Glioma With Co-deletion of 1p/19q - IMPROVE CODEL), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improvement of Functional Outcome for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Grade 2 or 3 Glioma With Co-deletion of 1p/19q - IMPROVE CODEL: the NOA-18 Trial
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improvement of functional outcome for patients with newly diagnosed grade 2 or 3 gliomas with co-deletion of 1p/19q - IMPROVE CODEL: the NOA-18 trial.BMC cancer · 2022Trial
- CogState computerized memory tests in patients with brain metastases: secondary endpoint results of NRG Oncology RTOG 0933.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2016Trial
- Long-term neurocognitive function and quality of life after multimodal therapy in adult glioma patients: a prospective long-term follow-up.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Article
- Acceptability and feasibility of cognitive assessments with adults with primary brain cancer and brain metastasis: A systematic review.Neuro-oncology practice · 2023Review
- Mid-term treatment-related cognitive sequelae in glioma patients.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2022Article
- Perioperative levetiracetam for seizure prophylaxis in seizure-naive brain tumor patients with focus on neurocognitive functioning.BMC neurology · 2022Article
- Multimodal assessment of disease activity in glioblastoma : A single center experience.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2021Article
- Complete response to therapy: why do primary central nervous system lymphoma patients not return to work?Journal of neuro-oncology · 2020Article
- Convergent and criterion validity of the CogState computerized brief battery cognitive assessment in women with and without breast cancer.The Clinical neuropsychologist · 2017Article
- Developing interventions for cancer-related cognitive dysfunction in childhood cancer survivors.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2014Review
- Investigation of cognitive impairments in people with brain tumors.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
NeuroCogFX is a short yet comprehensive computer-based neuropsychological battery of tests developed to investigate neurological patients for cognitive dysfunction after potentially neurotoxic therapy. NeuroCogFX had been standardized in a group of 242 healthy controls (Fliessbach et al., Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 74:643-650, 2006). The present study was conducted to assess the practicability, reliability, and validity of NeuroCogFX in brain tumor patients without active disease after tumor-directed therapy. To evaluate its validity, neuropsychological testing with NeuroCogFX was completed parallel to a battery of established neuropsychological tests in 54 patients with different types of brain tumors and without active disease for at least 6 months. Retest reliability was assessed in a different sample of 49 patients with gliomas. Results showed good practicability with a median test duration of 28 min (range 16-51 min). Most subtests showed medium-sized retest reliability in healthy controls and tumor patients, with the exception of the 2-back test and reaction time measures in tumor patients. Convergent validity was confirmed for the domains psychomotor speed, verbal memory, and verbal short-term memory. NeuroCogFX enables serial scientific neuropsychological assessment of brain tumor patients. It can be carried out within a short period of time by non-academic personnel and is therefore applicable to large cohorts, e.g., within clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20449630What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.