Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20449630›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2010

Computer-based assessment of cognitive functions in brain tumor patients.

Klaus Fliessbach, Sabine Rogowski, Christian Hoppe, Michael Sabel, Mathias Goeppert, Christoph Helmstaedter, Pasquale Calabrese, Gabriele Schackert, Joerg-Christian Tonn, Matthias Simon and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05331521 (Improvement of Functional Outcome for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Grade 2 or 3 Glioma With Co-deletion of 1p/19q - IMPROVE CODEL), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05331521 phase3recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Improvement of Functional Outcome for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Grade 2 or 3 Glioma With Co-deletion of 1p/19q - IMPROVE CODEL: the NOA-18 Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital HeidelbergRan2021 to 2033Enrolled406ConditionsOligodendrogliomaArmsCETEG, PCV, RT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Klaus FliessbachDepartment of Epileptology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Sabine Rogowski
Christian Hoppe
Michael Sabel
Mathias Goeppert
Christoph Helmstaedter
Pasquale Calabrese
Gabriele Schackert
Joerg-Christian Tonn
Matthias Simon
Uwe Schlegel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NeuroCogFX is a short yet comprehensive computer-based neuropsychological battery of tests developed to investigate neurological patients for cognitive dysfunction after potentially neurotoxic therapy. NeuroCogFX had been standardized in a group of 242 healthy controls (Fliessbach et al., Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 74:643-650, 2006). The present study was conducted to assess the practicability, reliability, and validity of NeuroCogFX in brain tumor patients without active disease after tumor-directed therapy. To evaluate its validity, neuropsychological testing with NeuroCogFX was completed parallel to a battery of established neuropsychological tests in 54 patients with different types of brain tumors and without active disease for at least 6 months. Retest reliability was assessed in a different sample of 49 patients with gliomas. Results showed good practicability with a median test duration of 28 min (range 16-51 min). Most subtests showed medium-sized retest reliability in healthy controls and tumor patients, with the exception of the 2-back test and reaction time measures in tumor patients. Convergent validity was confirmed for the domains psychomotor speed, verbal memory, and verbal short-term memory. NeuroCogFX enables serial scientific neuropsychological assessment of brain tumor patients. It can be carried out within a short period of time by non-academic personnel and is therefore applicable to large cohorts, e.g., within clinical trials.

Indexed as

Neuropsychological TestsAdolescentAdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsCognition DisordersDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurologic ExaminationPrincipal Component AnalysisReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.