Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20447814›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in immunology2010

Designing CD8+ T cell vaccines: it's not rocket science (yet).

Jonathan W Yewdell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in immunology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A nanovaccine for enhancing cellular immunity via cytosolic co-delivery of antigen and polyIC RNA.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Specificity of CD8Vaccines · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan W YewdellLaboratory of Viral Diseases, NIAID, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. JYEWDELL@nih.gov
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Processing Of Viral Proteins For T Cell RecognitionZIAAI000542 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI YEWDELL, JONATHAN W · 2009 to 2015
$2.8M
Proteolytic Generation Of Antigenic PeptidesZIAAI000658 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI BENNINK, JACK R · 2009 to 2012
$1.9M
PROCESSING OF VIRAL PROTEINS FOR T CELL RECOGNITIONZ01AI000542 · NIAID · NIAID EXTRAMURAL ACTIVITIES · PI YEWDELL, JONATHAN W · 1988 to 2008
$1.6M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 AI000542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CD8+ T cells play important roles in clearing viral infections and eradicating tumors. Designing vaccines that elicit effective CD8+ T cell responses requires a thorough knowledge of the pathways of antigen presentation in vivo. Here, I review recent progress in understanding the activation of naïve CD8+ T cells in vivo, with particular emphasis on cross-priming, the presentation of protein antigens acquired by dendritic cells from their environment. With the rapid advances in this area of research, the dawn of rational vaccine design is at hand.

Indexed as

Drug DesignAnimalsAntigen PresentationCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCross-PrimingHumansLymphocyte ActivationMiceVaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID20447814
PMCPMC2908899
OpenAlexW2035217221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.