ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology1991
Lead-exposed workmen and fertility: a cohort study on 354 subjects.
Article in European journal of epidemiology, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Survey of methods and statistical models used in the analysis of occupational cohort studies.Occupational and environmental medicine · 1994Pooled it
- The Impact of the Flint Water Crisis on Fertility.Demography · 2019Article
- How does lead induce male infertility?Iranian journal of reproductive medicine · 2011Review
- Differences in national legislation for the implementation of lead regulations included in the European directive for the protection of the health and safety of workers with occupational exposure to chemical agents (98/24/EC).International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2007Article
- Time To Pregnancy and occupational lead exposure.Occupational and environmental medicine · 2003Article
- Male reproductive toxicity of lead in animals and humans. ASCLEPIOS Study Group.Occupational and environmental medicine · 1998Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A cohort study was conducted in a French battery factory in 1977-1982 to explore the relationship between occupational lead exposure and fertility. A total of 354 battery workers, divided into 229 lead-exposed subjects (corresponding with 886 person-years) and 125 non-lead-exposed subjects (corresponding with 598 person-years) were compared, in a person-year analysis, for the risk of infertility. Lead exposure, at any level of absorption, did not appear significantly associated with a reduction in fertility after controlling for potential confounders: age, French origin, educational level, number of children at start of the period, cigarette smoking and exposure to heat. The apparent inconsistency between our results and those of several studies involving biological data and semen analysis is partially explained by recent knowledge relating to predictive value on the pregnancy of semen abnormalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.