ArticleAnalytical chemistry2010
Analysis of superoxide production in single skeletal muscle fibers.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Design and Application of Sensors for Chemical Cytometry.ACS chemical biology · 2018Review
- Indirect detection of superoxide in RAW 264.7 macrophage cells using microchip electrophoresis coupled to laser-induced fluorescence.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2015Article
- Methods for assessing mitochondrial function in diabetes.Diabetes · 2013Review
- Protein carbonylation and adipocyte mitochondrial function.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2012Article
- Chemical analysis of single cells.Analytical chemistry · 2011Review
- Chemical cytometry quantitates superoxide levels in the mitochondrial matrix of single myoblasts.Analytical chemistry · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Due to their high energetic profile, skeletal muscle fibers are prone to damage by endogenous reactive oxygen species (ROS), thereby causing alterations in muscle function. Unfortunately, the complexity of skeletal muscle makes it difficult to measure and understand ROS production by fibers since other components (e.g., extracellular collagen and vascular vessels) may also generate ROS. Single cell imaging techniques are promising approaches to monitor ROS production in single muscle fibers, but usually the detection schemes for ROS are not specific. Single cell analysis by capillary electrophoresis (aka chemical cytometry) has the potential to separate and detect specific ROS reporters, but the approach is only suitable for small spherical cells that fit within the capillary lumen. Here, we report a novel method for the analysis of superoxide in single fibers maintained in culture for up to 48 h. Cultured muscle fibers in individual nanoliter-volume wells were treated with triphenylphosphonium hydroethidine (TPP-HE), which forms the superoxide specific reporter hydroxytriphenylphosphonium ethidium (OH-TPP-E(+)). After lysis of each fiber in their corresponding nanowell, the contents of each well were processed and analyzed by micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography with laser-induced fluorescence detection (MEKC-LIF) making it possible to detect superoxide found in single fibers. Superoxide basal levels as well as changes due to fiber treatment with the scavenger, tiron, and the inducer, antimycin A, were easily monitored demonstrating the feasibility of the method. Future uses of the method include parallel single-fiber measurements aiming at comparing pharmacological treatments on the same set of fibers and investigating ROS production in response to muscle disease, disuse, exercise, and aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.