Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2044644›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology1991

Coronary drug project: experience with niacin. Coronary Drug Project Research Group.

K G Berge, P L Canner

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT00000483. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00000483 nacompleted

Coronary Drug Project Mortality Surveillance

Ran1981Registered outcomes0Posted comparisons0ConditionsCardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease, Heart Diseases, Myocardial InfarctionArmsclofibrate, dextrothyroxine sodium, Estrogen, niacin
PMID 3782631PMID 6675887PMID 6675888other papers from this trial
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Niacin for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017 · on this map
    Pooled it
  2. Statins and fibrates for preventing melanoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2005
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. NAD metabolism and heart failure: Mechanisms and therapeutic potentials.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. NADEMBO molecular medicine · 2021
    Review
  14. NADFrontiers in physiology · 2020
    Review
  15. Niacin: an old lipid drug in a new NADJournal of lipid research · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Niacin added to statins for cardiovascular disease.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2012
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K G BergeMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.
P L Canner
Maryland Medical Research Institute · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Niacin was one of the treatments compared in the Coronary Drug Project, a placebo-controlled, multicenter trial of lipid-lowering drugs in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. A total of 1119 men, aged 30-64 at entry, were randomized to niacin and 2789 to placebo by the end of recruitment in March 1969. Although side-effects interfered with adherence to the niacin regimen, it was the most effective agent in achieving cholesterol-lowering (10% overall); other agents in the trial were clofibrate, dextrothyroxine, and conjugated equine estrogens. At the scheduled conclusion of the trial in February 1975, the niacin-treated group exhibited a statistically significantly lower incidence of definite, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) than the placebo group. There was a trend toward improvement in the life-table mortality curve, but this was not statistically significant. In 1981 an extended follow-up was carried out concerning vital status for the 6008 men who were still alive at the end of treatment and active follow-up in the trial in 1975 (827 in the niacin group and 2008 in placebo groups). Vital status was determined for 99.1% of these men after a mean of 9 years from conclusion of the trial. In the group previously randomized to niacin, there were 69 (11%) fewer deaths than were expected on the basis of mortality in the placebo group. This difference was significant (z = -3.52; P = 0.0004). The data also suggested that patients with a higher baseline cholesterol experienced greater benefit from niacin therapy, as did those with the best response to the drug.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Indexed as

AdultCoronary DiseaseDouble-Blind MethodFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNiacinNiacin

Identifiers

PMID2044644
OpenAlexW68098806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.