ArticleElectrophoresis2010
A comparative phosphoproteomic analysis of a human tumor metastasis model using a label-free quantitative approach.
Article in Electrophoresis, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- AEE788 Inhibits Basal Body Assembly and Blocks DNA Replication in the African Trypanosome.Molecular pharmacology · 2017Article
- NADH-Cytochrome b5 Reductase 3 Promotes Colonization and Metastasis Formation and Is a Prognostic Marker of Disease-Free and Overall Survival in Estrogen Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2015Article
- Analytical challenges translating mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics from discovery to clinical applications.Electrophoresis · 2014Review
- Global analysis of protein structural changes in complex proteomes.Nature biotechnology · 2014Article
- Label-free quantitative proteomics and N-terminal analysis of human metastatic lung cancer cells.Molecules and cells · 2014Article
- Reconstructing targetable pathways in lung cancer by integrating diverse omics data.Nature communications · 2013Article
- The nuclear envelope environment and its cancer connections.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alterations in cellular phosphorylation patterns have been implicated in a number of diseases, including cancer, through multiple mechanisms. Herein we present a survey of the phosphorylation profiles of an isogenic pair of human cancer cell lines with opposite metastatic phenotype. Phosphopeptides were enriched from tumor cell lysates with titanium dioxide and zirconium dioxide, and identified with nano-LC-MS/MS using an automatic cross-validation of MS/MS and MS/MS/MS (MS2+MS3) data-dependent neutral loss method. A spectral counting quantitative strategy was applied to the two cell line samples on the MS2-only scan, which was implemented successively after each MS2+MS3 scan in the same sample. For all regulated phosphopeptides reported by spectral counting analysis, sequence and phosphorylation site assignments were validated by a MS2+MS3 data-dependent neutral loss method. With this approach, we identified over 70 phosphorylated sites on 27 phosphoproteins as being differentially expressed with respect to tumor cell phenotype. The altered expression levels of proteins identified by LC-MS/MS were validated using Western blotting. Using network pathway analysis, we observed that the majority of the differentially expressed proteins were highly interconnected and belong to two major intracellular signaling pathways. Our findings suggest that the phosphorylation of isoform A of lamin A/C and GTPase activating protein binding protein 1 is associated with metastatic propensity. The study demonstrates a quantitative and comparative proteomics strategy to identify differential phosphorylation patterns in complex biological samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.