ArticleGenetica2010
A recombination survey using microsatellites: the O chromosome of Drosophila subobscura.
Article in Genetica, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adaptation of Drosophila subobscura chromosomal inversions to climatic variables: the Balkan natural population of Avala.Genetica · 2021Article
- The Cyclically SeasonalFrontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Patterns of geographic variation of thermal adapted candidate genes in Drosophila subobscura sex chromosome arrangements.BMC evolutionary biology · 2018Article
- Evidence of neofunctionalization after the duplication of the highly conserved Polycomb group gene Caf1-55 in the obscura group of Drosophila.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Inversions and adaptation to the plant toxin ouabain shape DNA sequence variation within and between chromosomal inversions of Drosophila subobscura.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Introgression in the Drosophila subobscura--D. Madeirensis sister species: evidence of gene flow in nuclear genes despite mitochondrial differentiation.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2014Article
- Gene flow and gene flux shape evolutionary patterns of variation in Drosophila subobscura.Heredity · 2013Article
- Genetic constraints for thermal coadaptation in Drosophila subobscura.BMC evolutionary biology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recombination plays an important role in species adaptation since it acts as an evolutionary force that can influence genome pattern organization. However, recombination can be detrimental in some situations, causing the breakdown of some adaptive gene combinations such as coadapted gene complexes. Genetic and cytological chromosome maps allow recombination throughout the genome to be analyzed. In this study we compare the recombination rate of two types of homokaryotypic lines of D. subobscura (O(ST) and O( 3+4 )) using a set of at least 13 microsatellite loci. The genetic maps obtained present similar lengths: 184 and 196 cM for O(ST) and O( 3+4 ) chromosomes, respectively. For most pairs of markers analyzed, a sample size of about 150 individuals appeared sufficient to obtain appropriate recombination values, with the exception of markers located in the same cytological band. Recombination rates seemed to be fairly uniform along the O chromosome, but some regional differences were observed. Several recombination hot and coldspots were detected, and their numbers were different in the homokaryotypic line types (O(ST) and O( 3+4 )). This variability could be attributed to differences between the genetic content of the two arrangements or to differences between the lines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20446104What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.