Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20446013›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2010

Impact of empiric antibiotic regimen on bowel colonization in neonates with suspected early onset sepsis.

U Parm, T Metsvaht, E Sepp, M-L Ilmoja, H Pisarev, M Pauskar, I Lutsar

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Antibiotic regimens for early-onset neonatal sepsis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Antibiotic regimens for late-onset neonatal sepsis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Collection of human bacteria at University of Tartu, Estonia.Microbiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effect of antibiotics in the first week of life on faecal microbiota development.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2022
    Article
  10. Genetic relatedness of Gram-negative bacteria colonizing gut and skin of neonates and mother's own milk.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Antimicrobial agent exposure and the emergence and spread of resistant microorganisms: issues associated with study design.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

U ParmInstitute of Microbiology, Tartu University, Ravila 19, 50411 Tartu, Estonia. ylleparm@nooruse.ee
T Metsvaht
E Sepp
M-L Ilmoja
H Pisarev
M Pauskar
I Lutsar
University of Tartu · EETallinn Health Care College · EETartu University Hospital · EE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of ampicillin and penicillin used for empiric treatment of early onset sepsis (EOS) on initial gut colonization by aerobic and facultative anaerobic microorganisms. A cluster-randomized, two-center, switch-over study was conducted in two paediatric intensive care units in Estonia and included 276 neonates. Rectal swabs were collected twice a week until discharge or day 60. Colonizing microbes were identified on species level and tested for ampicillin resistance (AR). The number of patients colonized with Gram negative microorganisms and Candida spp was similar in both treatment arms but ampicillin resulted in longer colonization duration (CD) of K. pneumonia (p = 0.012), AR Serratia spp (p = 0.012) and Candida spp (p = 0.02) and penicillin in that of AR Acinetobacter spp (p = 0.001). As for Gram positive microorganisms penicillin treatment was associated with a greater number of colonized patients and higher CD of Enterococcus spp and S. aureus but lower ones of S. haemolyticus and S. hominis. Influence of ampicillin and penicillin on initial gut colonization is somewhat different but these differences are of low clinical relevance and should not be a limiting step when choosing between these two antibiotics for the empiric treatment of EOS.

Indexed as

AmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaCandidaCross-Over StudiesEstoniaFemaleGastrointestinal TractHumansInfant, NewbornMalePenicillinsRectumAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsPenicillins

Identifiers

PMID20446013
OpenAlexW1999695980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.