Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20445466›Full record

ArticleMenopause (New York, N.Y.)2010

Hormone therapy discontinuation: physician practices after the Women's Health Initiative.

Katherine M Newton, Susan D Reed, Louis C Grothaus, Andrea Z La Croix, Larissa Nekhlyudov, Kelly Ehrlich, Evette J Ludman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Menopause (New York, N.Y.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katherine M NewtonGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA. newton.k@ghc.org
Susan D Reed
Louis C Grothaus
Andrea Z La Croix
Larissa Nekhlyudov
Kelly Ehrlich
Evette J Ludman

Funding

HRT Decision Making in the Post-WHI EraR01AG022578 · NIA · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI NEWTON, KATHERINE M. · 2004 to 2006
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS AG-022578NIA NIH HHS R01 AG022578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNo guidelines or randomized trials address best practices for hormone therapy (HT) discontinuation.

methodsWe conducted a survey study to explore HT discontinuation practices at Group Health and Harvard Vanguard, large integrated health systems in the Northwest and Northeast United States, focusing on differences between specialties and study site.

resultsThe response rate to the written questionnaire (mailed between December 2005 and May 2006) was 78.5% (736/928); this article reports the results for 483 eligible physicians. To discontinue oral HT, most physicians (91%) advised tapering, not immediate cessation (8%), and most (60%) suggested decreasing both dose and days per week. Almost 60% of physicians reported no experience with tapering patches. Harvard Vanguard physicians were more likely than Group Health physicians to encourage discontinuing HT and less likely to recommend resuming HT when a woman's symptoms returned after discontinuing HT. Physicians were most strongly influenced by their own experience (48%), advice from colleagues (25%), and the woman's preference (19%) when choosing a discontinuation strategy; only 2% relied on research evidence. Physicians endorsed various approaches to manage symptoms after HT discontinuation, most often behavioral changes (44%) and increased exercise (37%), and these approaches were more often endorsed by Harvard Vanguard physicians and obstetrician/gynecologists than Group Health physicians or family practitioners or internists.

conclusionsTwo health plans in the Northwestern and Northeastern United States have no standard protocol for HT discontinuation. Physicians customized approaches, influenced by their location, colleagues, and specialty. Research is needed to guide approaches to HT discontinuation.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAttitude of Health PersonnelComplementary TherapiesDietExerciseFamily PracticeFemaleGynecologyHealth BehaviorHormone Replacement TherapyHumansMiddle AgedObstetricsPatient PreferencePeer Group

Identifiers

PMID20445466
PMCPMC2901404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.