Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20445089›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2010

Colloquium paper: how grandmother effects plus individual variation in frailty shape fertility and mortality: guidance from human-chimpanzee comparisons.

Kristen Hawkes

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Demographic uniformitarianism: the theoretical basis of prehistoric demographic research and its cross-disciplinary challenges.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Women who breastfeed exhibit cognitive benefits after age 50.Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The multiple facets of Peto's paradox: a life-history model for the evolution of cancer suppression.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Article
  13. On the apparent rarity of epithelial cancers in captive chimpanzees.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Response to Jablonski and Chaplin.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2014
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristen HawkesDepartment of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
University of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the first paper to present formal theory explaining that senescence is a consequence of natural selection, W. D. Hamilton concluded that human postmenopausal longevity results from the contributions of ancestral grandmothers to the reproduction of their relatives. A grandmother hypothesis, subsequently elaborated with additional lines of evidence, helps explain both exceptional longevity and additional features of life history that distinguish humans from the other great apes. However, some of the variation observed in aging rates seems inconsistent with the tradeoffs between current and future reproduction identified by theory. In humans and chimpanzees, our nearest living relatives, individuals who bear offspring at faster rates do not cease bearing sooner. They continue to be fertile longer instead. Furthermore, within both species, groups with lower overall mortality rates have faster rates of increase in death risk with advancing age. These apparent contradictions to the expected life history tradeoffs likely result from heterogeneity in frailty among individuals. Whereas robust and frail alike must allocate investments between current and future reproduction, the more robust can afford more of both. This heterogeneity, combined with evolutionary tradeoffs and the key role of ancestral grandmothers they identify, helps explain aspects of human aging that increasingly concern us all.

Indexed as

AgingLongevityPostmenopauseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsBiodiversityBiological EvolutionFemaleHumansMenopauseMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalModels, GeneticModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID20445089
PMCPMC3024018
OpenAlexW1875760823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.