Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20445069›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2010

Local control of postinhibitory rebound spiking in CA1 pyramidal neuron dendrites.

Giorgio A Ascoli, Sonia Gasparini, Virginia Medinilla, Michele Migliore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. IProgress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giorgio A AscoliCenter for Neural Informatics, Structures, and Plasticity, Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030-4444, USA. ascoli@gmu.edu
Sonia Gasparini
Virginia Medinilla
Michele Migliore

Funding

Generation and Description of Neuronal Morphology and ConnectivityR01NS039600 · NINDS · GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY · PI ASCOLI, GIORGIO A · 1999 to 2024
$6.9M
Synaptic Integration in Radial Oblique dendritesR01NS035865 · NINDS · LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER · PI GASPARINI, SONIA · 2004 to 2008
$1.6M
CRCNS: Input/Output Relationship in CA3 Pyramidal CellsR01AG025633 · NIA · GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY · PI ASCOLI, GIORGIO A · 2004 to 2008
$1.5M
DENDRITIC K+ AND IH CHANNELS IN HIPPOCAMPAL NEURONSR29NS035865 · NINDS · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HSC NEW ORLEANS · PI MAGEE, JEFFREY C · 1997 to 2001
$211k
NIA NIH HHS AG25633NIA NIH HHS R01 AG025633NINDS NIH HHS NS035865NINDS NIH HHS NS39600NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS035865NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS039600NINDS NIH HHS R29 NS035865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postinhibitory rebound spiking is characteristic of several neuron types and brain regions, where it sustains spontaneous activity and central pattern generation. However, rebound spikes are rarely observed in the principal cells of the hippocampus under physiological conditions. We report that CA1 pyramidal neurons support rebound spikes mediated by hyperpolarization-activated inward current (I(h)), and normally masked by A-type potassium channels (K(A)). In both experiments and computational models, K(A) blockage or reduction consistently resulted in a somatic action potential upon release from hyperpolarizing injections in the soma or main apical dendrite. Rebound spiking was systematically abolished by the additional blockage or reduction of I(h). Since the density of both K(A) and I(h) increases in these cells with the distance from the soma, such "latent" mechanism may be most effective in the distal dendrites, which are targeted by a variety of GABAergic interneurons. Detailed computer simulations, validated against the experimental data, demonstrate that rebound spiking can result from activation of distal inhibitory synapses. In particular, partial K(A) reduction confined to one or few branches of the apical tuft may be sufficient to elicit a local spike following a train of synaptic inhibition. Moreover, the spatial extent and amount of K(A) reduction determines whether the dendritic spike propagates to the soma. These data suggest that the plastic regulation of K(A) can provide a dynamic switch to unmask postinhibitory spiking in CA1 pyramidal neurons. This newly discovered local modulation of postinhibitory spiking further increases the signal processing power of the CA1 synaptic microcircuitry.

Indexed as

4-AminopyridineAction PotentialsAnimalsBarium CompoundsCA1 Region, HippocampalComputer SimulationCyclic Nucleotide-Gated Cation ChannelsDendritesgamma-Aminobutyric AcidHyperpolarization-Activated Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated ChannelsIn Vitro TechniquesModels, NeurologicalNeural InhibitionPotassium Channel BlockersPotassium ChannelsPotassium Channels, Voltage-Gated4-AminopyridineBarium CompoundsCyclic Nucleotide-Gated Cation Channelsgamma-Aminobutyric AcidHyperpolarization-Activated Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated ChannelsPotassium Channel BlockersPotassium ChannelsPotassium Channels, Voltage-Gated

Identifiers

PMID20445069
PMCPMC3319664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.