ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2010
Molecular view of 43 S complex formation and start site selection in eukaryotic translation initiation.
Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deleterious mutation in FDX1L gene is associated with a novel mitochondrial muscle myopathy.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2014Trial
- Review
- Unconventional translation initiation factor EIF2A is required for Drosophila spermatogenesis.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2022Article
- Identification of a Novel Heterozygous Mutation in theFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Endoplasmic reticulum stress: New insights into the pathogenesis and treatment of retinal degenerative diseases.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2020Review
- A post-transcriptional program of chemoresistance by AU-rich elements and TTP in quiescent leukemic cells.Genome biology · 2020Article
- Toward a Kinetic Understanding of Eukaryotic Translation.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2019Review
- Characterizing Cellular Responses During Oncolytic Maraba Virus Infection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Translation acrobatics: how cancer cells exploit alternate modes of translational initiation.EMBO reports · 2018Review
- Review
- Defining the Akt1 interactome and its role in regulating the cell cycle.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Sbp1 modulates the translation of Pab1 mRNA in a poly(A)- and RGG-dependent manner.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2018Article
- Non-AUG translation: a new start for protein synthesis in eukaryotes.Genes & development · 2017Review
- Deletion of eIF2β lysine stretches creates a dominant negative that affects the translation and proliferation in human cell line: A tool for arresting the cell growth.Cancer biology & therapy · 2017Article
- eIF4F: a retrospective.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2015Review
- Review
- Ctk1 function is necessary for full translation initiation activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Eukaryotic cell · 2015Article
- Mechanism of cytoplasmic mRNA translation.The arabidopsis book · 2015Article
- Article
- Initiation codon selection is accomplished by a scanning mechanism without crucial initiation factors in Sindbis virus subgenomic mRNA.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A central step to high fidelity protein synthesis is selection of the proper start codon. Recent structural, biochemical, and genetic analyses have provided molecular insights into the coordinated activities of the initiation factors in start codon selection. A molecular model is emerging in which start codon recognition is linked to dynamic reorganization of factors on the ribosome and structural changes in the ribosome itself.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.