Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20444593›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2010

Evolution: a guide to perturb protein function and networks.

Olivier Lichtarge, Angela Wilkins

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in oncology · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genomic insights into head and neck cancer.Cancers of the head & neck · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The functional importance of co-evolving residues in proteins.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2014
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Olivier LichtargeDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA. lichtarge@bcm.edu
Angela Wilkins

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINET15LM007093 · NLM · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI Lydia E. Kavraki · 1992 to 2026
$20.8M
Functional Determinnats in G Protein-coupled ReceptorsR01GM066099 · NIGMS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LICHTARGE, OLIVIER · 2003 to 2022
$7.5M
Comparative genomics of protein structure and functionR01GM079656 · NIGMS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LICHTARGE, OLIVIER · 2007 to 2019
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM066099NIGMS NIH HHS GM079656NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM066099NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079656NLM NIH HHS 5T15LM07093NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein interactions give rise to networks that control cell fate in health and disease; selective means to probe these interactions are therefore of wide interest. We discuss here Evolutionary Tracing (ET), a comparative method to identify protein functional sites and to guide experiments that selectively block, recode, or mimic their amino acid determinants. These studies suggest, in principle, a scalable approach to perturb individual links in protein networks.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAmino Acid SequenceComputational BiologyGTP-Binding ProteinsHumansProtein EngineeringProteinsGTP-Binding ProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID20444593
PMCPMC2916956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.