Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20443771›Full record

ReviewCurrent drug abuse reviews2009

Neuropharmacology of the interoceptive stimulus properties of nicotine.

Thomas E Wooters, Rick A Bevins, Michael T Bardo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current drug abuse reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The inside story: Interoceptive Pavlovian conditioning with the nicotine stimulus.Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Assessment of Abuse-Related Discriminative Stimulus Effects of Nicotine Aerosol in Rodents.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas E WootersDepartment of Psychology, BBSRB, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536-0509, USA.
Rick A Bevins
Michael T Bardo

Funding

Developmemt of Novel Treatments for Nicotine AddictionU19DA017548 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI DWOSKIN, LINDA P · 2003 to 2007
$6.0M
Acquired Appetitive Properties of NicotineR01DA018114 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI BEVINS, RICK A · 2004 to 2010
$1.4M
Altering nicotine reward through conditioningR21DA023951 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI BEVINS, RICK A · 2008 to 2009
$339k
Reinforcing and neurochemical effects of cocaine in a rodent model of ADHDF31DA023853 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI WOOTERS, THOMAS E · 2008 to 2009
$59k
NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA023853NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA018114NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA023951NIDA NIH HHS U19 DA017548
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preclinical drug discrimination techniques play a significant role in advancing our knowledge of the receptor mechanisms underlying the interoceptive effects of nicotine. Early reports confirmed that nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are critical for transduction of the nicotine cue. In recent years, advances in molecular biology and the discovery of novel ligands with greater selectively for specific nAChR subtypes have furthered our understanding of these mechanisms. There is now evidence regarding the specific nAChR subtypes involved in nicotine discrimination; in addition, there is also evidence suggesting that other systems (i.e., adenosine, cannabinoid, dopamine, glutamate and serotonin) may play a modulatory role. The neuroanatomical structures mediating the nicotine cue have also begun to be elucidated. However, much remains to be learned about the predictive validity of the drug discrimination procedure, particularly with regard to the relation between interoceptive and reinforcing effects and individual differences in vulnerability to tobacco dependence. Recent data also suggests that the mechanisms involved in the conditional and discriminative stimulus properties of nicotine may be dissociable. Avenues for future research should include assessing the mechanisms of the subjective effects of nicotine withdrawal, factors contributing to individual differences in sensitivity to the nicotine cue, and the role of behavioral factors involved in drug cross-substitution.

Indexed as

AnimalsDiscrimination LearningHumansNicotineNicotinic AgonistsReceptors, NicotinicReinforcement, PsychologyTobacco Use DisorderNicotineNicotinic AgonistsReceptors, Nicotinic

Identifiers

PMID20443771
PMCPMC3086090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.