Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20443096›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2011

Perceptions of colorectal cancer screening in urban African American clinic patients: differences by gender and screening status.

Sarah Bauerle Bass, Thomas F Gordon, Sheryl Burt Ruzek, Caitlin Wolak, Stephanie Ward, Anuradha Paranjape, Karen Lin, Brian Meyer, Dominique G Ruggieri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Perceptions of and Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in Underserved Baltimore and Eastern Shore Populations.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Black-White disparities across the colorectal cancer care continuum in the USA.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Role of weight bias and patient-physician communication in the underutilization of bariatric surgery.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah Bauerle BassDepartment of Public Health, Temple University, Room 927, 1301 Cecil B. Moore Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA. sbass@temple.edu
Thomas F Gordon
Sheryl Burt Ruzek
Caitlin Wolak
Stephanie Ward
Anuradha Paranjape
Karen Lin
Brian Meyer
Dominique G Ruggieri
Temple University · US

Funding

"Using Perceptual Mapping to Develop Low Literacy CRC Screening Decision Aids"R21CA120122 · NCI · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI GORDON, THOMAS FRANK · 2007 to 2008
$330k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA120122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African Americans have higher colorectal cancer (CRC) morbidity and mortality than whites, yet have low rates of CRC screening. Few studies have explored African Americans' own perceptions of barriers to CRC screening or elucidated gender differences in screening status. Focus groups were conducted with 23 African American patients between 50 and 70 years of age who were patients in a general internal medicine clinic in a large urban teaching hospital. Focus groups were delimited by gender and CRC screening status. Focus group transcripts were analyzed using an iterative coding process with consensus and triangulation to develop thematic categories. Results indicated key thematic differences in perceptions of screening by gender and CRC screening status. While both men and women who had never been screened had a general lack of knowledge about CRC and screening modalities, women had an overall sense that health screenings were needed and indicated a stronger need to have a positive relationship with their doctor. Women also reported that African American men do not get colonoscopy because of the perceived sexual connotation. Men who had never been screened, compared to those who had been screened, had less trust of their doctors and the health care system and indicated an overall fear of going to the doctor. They also reiterated the sexual connotation of having a colonoscopy and were apprehensive about being sedated during the procedure. Overall, men expressed more fear and were more reluctant to undergo CRC screening than women, but among those who had undergone CRC screening, particularly colonoscopy, men expressed advantages of having the screening. All groups were also found to have a negative attitude about the use of fecal occult blood testing and felt colonoscopy was the superior screening modality. Results suggest that messages and education about CRC screening, particularly colonoscopy, might place more emphasis on accuracy and might be more effective in increasing screening rates among African Americans if tailored to gender and screening status.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningAgedAttitude to HealthBlack or African AmericanColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysician's RoleSex FactorsUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID20443096
PMCPMC2974023
OpenAlexW2078057538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.