Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20442713›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2010

Insulators and promoters: closer than we think.

Jesse R Raab, Rohinton T Kamakaka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Facilitators may represent a new class of regulatory elements.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Methods for Genome-Wide Chromatin Interaction Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jesse R RaabDepartment of Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology, Sinsheimer Labs, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA.
Rohinton T Kamakaka
University of California, Santa Cruz · US

Funding

Training Program/Molecular/Cell/Developmental BiologyT32GM008646 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI STROME, SUSAN · 1999 to 2018
$3.7M
Chromatin Domain DynamicsR01GM078068 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI KAMAKAKA, ROHINTON T. · 2007 to 2018
$3.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM078068NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078068NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008646NIGMS NIH HHS T32-GM008646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insulators prevent promiscuous gene regulation by restricting the action of enhancers and silencers. Recent studies have revealed a number of similarities between insulators and promoters, including binding of specific transcription factors, chromatin-modification signatures and localization to specific subnuclear positions. We propose that enhancer-blockers and silencing barrier-insulators might have evolved as specialized derivatives of promoters and that the two types of element use related mechanisms to mediate their distinct functions. These insights can help to reconcile different models of insulator action.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsChromosome MappingEnhancer Elements, GeneticGene Expression RegulationHumansInsulator ElementsModels, BiologicalModels, GeneticPromoter Regions, GeneticTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID20442713
PMCPMC3477808
OpenAlexW2074531605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.