Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20442433›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2010

Cerebrospinal T-cell responses aid in the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis in a human immunodeficiency virus- and tuberculosis-endemic population.

Vinod B Patel, Ravesh Singh, Cathy Connolly, Yacoob Coovadia, Abdool K C Peer, Priyashini Parag, Victoria Kasprowicz, Alimuddin Zumla, Thumbi Ndung'u, Keertan Dheda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Challenges in the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Tuberculosis Meningitis.Current infectious disease reports · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. The diagnostic value of cerebrospinal fluid chemistry results in childhood tuberculous meningitis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Vinod B PatelDepartment of Neurology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Ravesh Singh
Cathy Connolly
Yacoob Coovadia
Abdool K C Peer
Priyashini Parag
Victoria Kasprowicz
Alimuddin Zumla
Thumbi Ndung'u
Keertan Dheda
Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa · ZAUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZALancet Laboratories · ZALondon International Development Centre · GBSouth African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

TUBERCULOSIS SUPPLEMENTD43TW000231 · FIC · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI ABDOOL KARIM, QUARRAISHA · 1993 to 2014
$13.1M
FIC NIH HHS D43TW00231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleCurrent tools for the rapid diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) are suboptimal. We evaluated the clinical utility of a quantitative RD-1 IFN-gamma T-cell enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay (T-SPOT.TB), using cerebrospinal fluid cells for the rapid immunodiagnosis of TBM.

objectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic utility of the RD1 antigen- specific ELISPOT assay for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis.

methodsThe ELISPOT assay was evaluated in 150 patients with suspected TBM who were categorized as definite-TBM, probable-TBM, and non-TBM. Culture or polymerase chain reaction positivity for Mycobacerium tuberculosis served as the reference standard. To determine the diagnostic value of the ELISPOT assay, a clinical prediction rule was derived from baseline clinical and laboratory parameters using a multivariable regression model. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsA total of 140 patients (81% HIV-infected; median CD4 count, 160 cells/mm(3)) were included in the final analysis. When comparing the definite-TBM (n = 38) and non-TBM groups (n = 48), the ELISPOT assay (cut point of > or =228 spot-forming cells per 1 million mononuclear cells) was a useful rule-in test: sensitivity 58% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41-74); specificity 94% (95% CI, 83-99). However, ELISPOT outcomes improved when other rapid tests were concurrently used to exclude bacterial (Gram stain) and cryptococcal meningitis (latex-agglutination test) within the non-TBM group. Using this approach, the ELISPOT assay (cut point of > or =46 spot-forming cells) was an excellent rule-in test: sensitivity 82% (95% CI, 66-92); specificity 100% (95% CI, 78-100); positive predictive value, 100% (95% CI, 89-100); negative predictive value, 68% (95% CI, 45-86); area under the curve, 0.90. The ELISPOT assay had incremental diagnostic value compared with the clinical prediction rule.

conclusionsThe RD-1 ELISPOT assay, using cerebrospinal fluid mononuclear cells and in conjunction with other rapid confirmatory tests (Gram stain and cryptococcal latex-agglutination test), is an accurate rapid rule-in test for TBM in a TB and HIV endemic setting.

Indexed as

Endemic DiseasesAIDS-Related Opportunistic InfectionsArea Under CurveCerebrospinal FluidComorbidityEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansInterferon-gammaMycobacterium tuberculosisProspective StudiesROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificitySouth AfricaT-LymphocytesInterferon-gamma

Identifiers

PMID20442433
PMCPMC2937246
OpenAlexW2116331892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.