Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20442215›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the National Cancer Institute2010

Lung cancer screening in the randomized Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.

William G Hocking, Ping Hu, Martin M Oken, Stephen D Winslow, Paul A Kvale, Philip C Prorok, Lawrence R Ragard, John Commins, David A Lynch, Gerald L Andriole and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Screening for lung cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cancer overdiagnosis: a challenge in the era of screening.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2022
    Article
  17. CD133 as a Biomarker for an Autoantibody-to-ImmunoPET Paradigm for the Early Detection of Small Cell Lung Cancer.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

William G HockingDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Marshfield Clinic, 1000 North Oak Avenue, Marshfield, WI 54449, USA. hocking.william@marshfieldclinic.org
Ping Hu
Martin M Oken
Stephen D Winslow
Paul A Kvale
Philip C Prorok
Lawrence R Ragard
John Commins
David A Lynch
Gerald L Andriole
Saundra S Buys
Mona N Fouad
Carl R Fuhrman
Claudine Isaacs
Lance A Yokochi
Thomas L Riley
Paul F Pinsky
John K Gohagan
Christine D Berg
PLCO Project Team
National Institutes of Health · USInformation Management Services · USGeorgetown University · USHenry Ford Health System · USMarshfield Clinic · USPacific Health Research and Education Institute · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Minnesota, Duluth · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USWashington University in St. Louis · USWestat (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 5-year overall survival rate of lung cancer patients is approximately 15%. Most patients are diagnosed with advanced-stage disease and have shorter survival rates than patients with early-stage disease. Although screening for lung cancer has the potential to increase early diagnosis, it has not been shown to reduce lung cancer mortality rates. In 1993, the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial was initiated specifically to determine whether screening would reduce mortality rates from PLCO cancers.

methodsA total of 77 464 participants, aged 55-74 years, were randomly assigned to the intervention arm of the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial between November 8, 1993, and July 2, 2001. Participants received a baseline chest radiograph (CXR), followed by three annual single-view CXRs at the 10 US screening centers. Cancers were classified as screen detected and nonscreen detected (interval or never screened) and according to tumor histology. The positivity rates of screen-detected cancers and positive predictive values (PPVs) were calculated. Because 51.6% of the participants were current or former smokers, logistic regression analysis was performed to control for smoking status. All statistical tests were two-sided.

resultsCompliance with screening decreased from 86.6% at baseline to 78.9% at the last screening. Overall positivity rates were 8.9% at baseline and 6.6%-7.1% at subsequent screenings; positivity rates increased modestly with smoking risk categories (P(trend) < .001). The PPVs for all participants were 2.0% at baseline and 1.1%, 1.5%, and 2.4% at years 1, 2, and 3, respectively; PPVs in current smokers were 5.9% at baseline and 3.3%, 4.2%, and 5.6% at years 1, 2, and 3, respectively. A total of 564 lung cancers were diagnosed, of which 306 (54%) were screen-detected cancers and 87% were non-small cell lung cancers. Among non-small cell lung cancers, 59.6% of screen-detected cancers and 33.3% of interval cancers were early (I-II) stage.

conclusionsThe PLCO Cancer Screening Trial demonstrated the ability to recruit, retain, and screen a large population over multiple years at multiple centers. A higher proportion of screen-detected lung cancers were early stage, but a conclusion on the effectiveness of CXR screening must await final PLCO results, which are anticipated at the end of 2015.

Indexed as

Mass Chest X-RayAgedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsPatient ComplianceProstatic NeoplasmsSmoking

Identifiers

PMID20442215
PMCPMC2873186
OpenAlexW2163718601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.