Trial reportJournal of the National Cancer Institute2010
Lung cancer screening in the randomized Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.
Trial report in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic variants in RUNX3, AMD1 and MSRA in the methionine metabolic pathway and survival in nonsmall cell lung cancer patients.International journal of cancer · 2019Pooled it
- Screening for lung cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Guideline
- From randomized trials to the clinic: is it time to implement individual lung-cancer screening in clinical practice? A multidisciplinary statement from French experts on behalf of the French intergroup (IFCT) and the groupe d'Oncologie de langue francaise (GOLF).Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2013Guideline
- Diagnostic evaluation following a positive lung screening chest radiograph in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2013Trial
- Trial
- The Vanguard Study: Assessing feasibility of conducting randomized trials of novel multi-cancer detection tests.Contemporary clinical trials · 2026Article
- Beyond One-Size-Fits-All Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: Risk-Adapted Follow-Up, De-Escalation Pathways, and Focal Therapy as Tailored Strategy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- 2021 Clinical Practice Guidelines on Periodic Health Examination.Acta medica Philippina · 2026Article
- Lung cancer screening for never smokers: current evidence and future directions.Singapore medical journal · 2026Review
- Chest X-Ray Foundation Model With Global and Local Representations Integration.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2025Article
- Cohort Profile: The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.International journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Potentially functional variants of PARK7 and DDR2 in ferroptosis-related genes predict survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Potentially functional variants of ERRFI1 in hypoxia-related genes predict survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Associations of chest X-ray trajectories, smoking, and the risk of lung cancer in two population-based cohort studies.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Cancer overdiagnosis: a challenge in the era of screening.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2022Article
- CD133 as a Biomarker for an Autoantibody-to-ImmunoPET Paradigm for the Early Detection of Small Cell Lung Cancer.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022Article
- Development and validation of a polygenic hazard score to predict prognosis and adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2022Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2022Review
- Potentially functional variants of ERAP1, PSMF1 and NCF2 in the MHC-I-related pathway predict non-small cell lung cancer survival.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe 5-year overall survival rate of lung cancer patients is approximately 15%. Most patients are diagnosed with advanced-stage disease and have shorter survival rates than patients with early-stage disease. Although screening for lung cancer has the potential to increase early diagnosis, it has not been shown to reduce lung cancer mortality rates. In 1993, the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial was initiated specifically to determine whether screening would reduce mortality rates from PLCO cancers.
methodsA total of 77 464 participants, aged 55-74 years, were randomly assigned to the intervention arm of the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial between November 8, 1993, and July 2, 2001. Participants received a baseline chest radiograph (CXR), followed by three annual single-view CXRs at the 10 US screening centers. Cancers were classified as screen detected and nonscreen detected (interval or never screened) and according to tumor histology. The positivity rates of screen-detected cancers and positive predictive values (PPVs) were calculated. Because 51.6% of the participants were current or former smokers, logistic regression analysis was performed to control for smoking status. All statistical tests were two-sided.
resultsCompliance with screening decreased from 86.6% at baseline to 78.9% at the last screening. Overall positivity rates were 8.9% at baseline and 6.6%-7.1% at subsequent screenings; positivity rates increased modestly with smoking risk categories (P(trend) < .001). The PPVs for all participants were 2.0% at baseline and 1.1%, 1.5%, and 2.4% at years 1, 2, and 3, respectively; PPVs in current smokers were 5.9% at baseline and 3.3%, 4.2%, and 5.6% at years 1, 2, and 3, respectively. A total of 564 lung cancers were diagnosed, of which 306 (54%) were screen-detected cancers and 87% were non-small cell lung cancers. Among non-small cell lung cancers, 59.6% of screen-detected cancers and 33.3% of interval cancers were early (I-II) stage.
conclusionsThe PLCO Cancer Screening Trial demonstrated the ability to recruit, retain, and screen a large population over multiple years at multiple centers. A higher proportion of screen-detected lung cancers were early stage, but a conclusion on the effectiveness of CXR screening must await final PLCO results, which are anticipated at the end of 2015.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.