Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20441755›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2010

Kinetics and reaction coordinates of the reassembly of protein fragments via forward flux sampling.

Ernesto E Borrero, Lydia M Contreras Martínez, Matthew P DeLisa, Fernando A Escobedo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ernesto E BorreroSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Lydia M Contreras Martínez
Matthew P DeLisa
Fernando A Escobedo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We studied the mechanism of the reassembly and folding process of two fragments of a split lattice protein by using forward flux sampling (FFS). Our results confirmed previous thermodynamics and kinetics analyses that suggested that the disruption of the critical core (of an unsplit protein that folds by a nucleation mechanism) plays a key role in the reassembly mechanism of the split system. For several split systems derived from a parent 48-mer model, we estimated the reaction coordinates in terms of collective variables by using the FFS least-square estimation method and found that the reassembly transition is best described by a combination of the total number of native contacts, the number of interchain native contacts, and the total conformational energy of the split system. We also analyzed the transition path ensemble obtained from FFS simulations using the estimated reaction coordinates as order parameters to identify the microscopic features that differentiate the reassembly of the different split systems studied. We found that in the fastest folding split system, a balanced distribution of the original-core amino acids (of the unsplit system) between protein fragments propitiates interchain interactions at early stages of the folding process. Only this system exhibits a different reassembly mechanism from that of the unsplit protein, involving the formation of a different folding nucleus. In the slowest folding system, the concentration of the folding nucleus in one fragment causes its early prefolding, whereas the second fragment tends to remain as a detached random coil. We also show that the reassembly rate can be either increased or decreased by tuning interchain cooperativeness via the introduction of a single point mutation that either strengthens or weakens one of the native interchain contacts (prevalent in the transition state ensemble).

Indexed as

Protein FoldingKineticsModels, MolecularPeptide FragmentsProbabilityProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein DenaturationThermodynamicsPeptide Fragments

Identifiers

PMID20441755
PMCPMC2862158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.