Peptide-nanotube biochips for label-free detection of multiple pathogens.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Supramolecular assembly of protein building blocks: from folding to function.Nano convergence · 2022
   Review
2. Electroactive peptide-based supramolecular polymers.Materials today. Bio · 2021
   Review
3. Self-assembling peptide semiconductors.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2017
   Review
4. Assemblies of Functional Peptides and Their Applications in Building Blocks for Biosensors.Advanced functional materials · 2011
   Article
5. Applications of peptide and protein-based materials in bionanotechnology.Chemical Society reviews · 2010
   Review
6. Bioinspired target-specific crystallization on peptide nanotubes for ultrasensitive Pb ion detection.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2010
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as