ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2010
Performance of first mammography examination in women younger than 40 years.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Clinicopathologic Features of Breast Cancer in Egypt-Contemporary Profile and Future Needs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JCO global oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Diagnostic Value of Nonacid Nucleic Blood Tumor Marker Panels in Early Diagnosing Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Disease markers · 2022Pooled it
- Medical barriers to mammography screening of African American women in a high cancer mortality area: implications for cancer educators and health providers.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2011Trial
- Advancing women's health in Egypt: an economic evaluation of the presidential initiative for nationwide breast cancer early detection and treatment.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Article
- A Retrospective Analysis of Diagnostic Breast Imaging Outcomes in Young Women at a Tertiary Care Center.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Article
- Population simulation modeling of disparities in US breast cancer mortality.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2023Article
- Performance analysis of screening mammography in Asian women under 40 years.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2023Article
- Multimodal analysis of genome-wide methylation, copy number aberrations, and end motif signatures enhances detection of early-stage breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Breast Cancer in the United Arab Emirates.JCO global oncology · 2023Review
- Breast cancer incidence among women with a family history of breast cancer by relative's age at diagnosis.Cancer · 2022Article
- Evolution of breast cancer incidence in young women in a French registry from 1990 to 2018: Towards a change in screening strategy?Breast cancer research : BCR · 2022Article
- Racial and regional disparities of triple negative breast cancer incidence rates in the United States: An analysis of 2011-2019 NPCR and SEER incidence data.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Age at initiation of screening mammography by family history of breast cancer in the breast cancer surveillance consortium.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2021Article
- Evaluation of Different Breast Cancer Screening Strategies for High-Risk Women in Beijing, China: A Real-World Population-Based Study.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Article
- Characterizing Breast Lesions Using Quantitative Parametric 3D Subharmonic Imaging: A Multicenter Study.Academic radiology · 2020Article
- Does Breast Cancer Increasingly Affect Younger Women?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Protein Conformational Changes in Breast Cancer Sera Using Infrared Spectroscopic Analysis.Cancers · 2020Article
- Age-Specific Breast Density Changes in Taiwanese Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Features of Microcalcifications on Screening Mammography in Young WomenAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFew data have been published on mammography performance in women who are younger than 40 years.
methodsWe pooled data from six mammography registries across the United States from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. We included 117 738 women who were aged 18-39 years when they had their first screening or diagnostic mammogram during 1995-2005 and followed them for 1 year to determine accuracy of mammography assessment. We measured the recall rate for screening examinations and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and cancer detection rate for all mammograms.
resultsFor screening mammograms, no cancers were detected in 637 mammograms for women aged 18-24 years. For women aged 35-39 years who had the largest number of screening mammograms (n = 73 335) in this study, the recall rate was 12.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 12.4% to 12.9%), sensitivity was 76.1% (95% CI = 69.2% to 82.6%), specificity was 87.5% (95% CI = 87.2% to 87.7%), positive predictive value was 1.3% (95% CI = 1.1% to 1.5%), and cancer detection rate was 1.6 cancers per 1000 mammograms (95% CI = 1.3 to 1.9 cancers per 1000 mammograms). Most (67 468 [77.7%]) of the 86 871 women screened reported no family history of breast cancer. For diagnostic mammograms, the age-adjusted rates across all age groups were: sensitivity of 85.7% (95% CI = 82.7% to 88.7%), specificity of 88.8% (95% CI = 88.4% to 89.1%), positive predictive value of 14.6% (95% CI = 13.3% to 15.8%), and cancer detection rate of 14.3 cancers per 1000 mammograms (95% CI = 13.0 to 15.7 cancers per 1000 mammograms). Mammography performance, except for specificity, improved in the presence of a breast lump.
conclusionsYounger women have very low breast cancer rates but after mammography experience high recall rates, high rates of additional imaging, and low cancer detection rates. We found no cancers in women younger than 25 years and poor performance for the large group of women aged 35-39 years. In a theoretical population of 10 000 women aged 35-39 years, 1266 women who are screened will receive further workup, with 16 cancers detected and 1250 women receiving a false-positive result.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.