ArticleCirculation2010
Effect of hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitors on the long-term progression of rheumatic mitral valve disease.
Article in Circulation, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel inflammatory markers based on complete blood count and PBMV success in rheumatic mitral stenosis.Biomarkers in medicine · 2025Article
- An Update on Mitral Valve Aging.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- Effect of Telehealth Services on Mitral and Tricuspid Regurgitation Progression: Retrospective Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Effect of Dapagliflozin on Patients with Rheumatic Heart Disease Mitral Stenosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Use of strain and strain rate echocardiographic imaging to predict the progression of mitral stenosis: a 5-year follow-up study the progression of mitral stenosis: a 5-year follow-up study.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2016Article
- Statins for aortic valve stenosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Review
- Statins: cardiovascular risk reduction in percutaneous coronary intervention-basic and clinical evidence of hyperacute use of statins.International journal of hypertension · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAt present, no medical therapy is known to affect the progression of rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS). We sought to assess the effect of statin treatment on long-term progression of MS in a large population. METHODS AND
resultsFrom our 20-year database, we identified all patients with rheumatic MS with > or =2 echocardiographies > or =1 year apart. Exclusion criteria were previous intervention on the mitral valve, more than moderate aortic regurgitation, or symptoms at first examination. The study sample included 315 patients (mean age, 61+/-12 years; 224 women); 35 patients (11.1%) were treated with statins, and 280 (88.9%) were not. Mean follow-up period was 6.1+/-4.0 years (range, 1 to 20). The rate of decrease in mitral valve area was significantly lower in the statin group compared with the untreated group (0.027+/-0.056 versus 0.067+/-0.082 cm(2)/y; P=0.005). The annualized change in mean transmitral gradient was lower in statin-treated patients (0.20+/-0.59 versus 0.58+/-0.96 mm Hg/y; P=0.023). The prevalence of fast MS progression (annual change in mitral valve area >0.08 cm(2)) was significantly lower in the statin group (P=0.008). An increase in systolic pulmonary artery pressure of >10 mm Hg was found in 17% of patients in the statin group versus 40% of untreated patients (P=0.045).
conclusionsOur study shows a significantly slower progression of rheumatic MS in patients treated with statins. These findings could have an important impact in the early medical therapy of patients with rheumatic heart disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.