Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20439627›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2010

Estrogen alone in postmenopausal women and breast cancer detection by means of mammography and breast biopsy.

Rowan T Chlebowski, Garnet Anderson, JoAnn E Manson, Mary Pettinger, Shagufta Yasmeen, Dorothy Lane, Robert D Langer, F Allan Hubbell, Anne McTiernan, Susan Hendrix and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Long-term hormone therapy for perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. The Role of Estrogen across Multiple Disease Mechanisms.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The Effect of Menopausal Hormone Therapies on Breast Cancer: Avoiding the Risk.Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America · 2015
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rowan T ChlebowskiLos Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor UCLA Medical Center, University of California-Los Angeles, 1124 W. Carson St., Torrance, CA 90502, USA. rchlebowski@gmail.com
Garnet Anderson
JoAnn E Manson
Mary Pettinger
Shagufta Yasmeen
Dorothy Lane
Robert D Langer
F Allan Hubbell
Anne McTiernan
Susan Hendrix
Robert Schenken
Marcia L Stefanick
Los Angeles Medical Center · US

Funding

WOMENS HEALTH INITIATIVE-N01WH22110N01WH022110 · WH · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI ROSS, PRENTICE · 1992 to 2006
$1.2M
WHI NIH HHS N01 WH022110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAs the influence of estrogen alone on breast cancer detection is not established, we examined this issue in the Women's Health Initiative trial, which randomly assigned 10,739 postmenopausal women with prior hysterectomy to conjugated equine estrogen (CEE; 0.625 mg/d) or placebo.

methodsScreening mammography and breast exams were performed at baseline and annually. Breast biopsies were based on clinical findings. Effects of CEE alone on breast cancer detection were determined by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses of mammogram performance.

resultsAfter a 7.1-year mean follow-up, fewer invasive breast cancers were diagnosed in the CEE than in the placebo group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Use of CEE alone increased mammograms with short-interval follow-up recommendations (cumulative, 39.2% v 29.6.3%; P < .001) but not abnormal mammograms (ie, those suggestive of or highly suggestive of malignancy; cumulative, 7.3% v 7.0%; P = .41). Breast biopsies were more frequent in the CEE group (cumulative, 12.5% v 10.7%; P = .004) and less commonly diagnosed as cancer (8.9% v 15.8%, respectively, with positive biopsies; P = .04). Mammographic breast cancer detection in the CEE group was significantly compromised only in the early years of use.

conclusionCEE alone use for 5 years results in approximately one in 11 and one in 50 women having otherwise avoidable mammograms with short-interval follow-up recommendations or breast biopsies, respectively. Although the breast biopsies on CEE were less commonly diagnosed as cancer, breast cancer detection was not substantially compromised. These findings differ from estrogen-plus-progestin use, for which significantly increased abnormal mammograms and a compromise in breast cancer detection are seen.

Indexed as

AgedAge DistributionArea Under CurveBiopsy, NeedleBreast NeoplasmsEstrogen Replacement TherapyEstrogens, Conjugated (USP)FemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHysterectomyImmunohistochemistryIncidenceMammographyMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingEstrogens, Conjugated (USP)

Identifiers

PMID20439627
PMCPMC2881849
OpenAlexW2100592280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.