ArticleBMC bioinformatics2010
SeqRate: sequence-based protein folding type classification and rates prediction.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Protein Science Meets Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review and a Biochemical Meta-Analysis of an Inter-Field.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Pooled it
- Guiding Peptide Kinetics via Collective-Variable Tuning of Free-Energy Barriers.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Improving the Reliability of Protein Folding Rate Predictions by Applying Guidelines for Validating QSAR/QSPR Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- PERISCOPE-Opt: Machine learning-based prediction of optimal fermentation conditions and yields of recombinant periplasmic protein expressed inComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Chaperone client proteins evolve slower than non-client proteins.Functional & integrative genomics · 2020Article
- Stepwise optimization of recombinant protein production in Escherichia coli utilizing computational and experimental approaches.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Review
- How Quickly Do Proteins Fold and Unfold, and What Structural Parameters Correlate with These Values?Biomolecules · 2020Article
- Periscope: quantitative prediction of soluble protein expression in the periplasm of Escherichia coli.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Sequence analysis on the information of folding initiation segments in ferredoxin-like fold proteins.BMC structural biology · 2014Article
- The MULTICOM toolbox for protein structure prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProtein folding rate is an important property of a protein. Predicting protein folding rate is useful for understanding protein folding process and guiding protein design. Most previous methods of predicting protein folding rate require the tertiary structure of a protein as an input. And most methods do not distinguish the different kinetic nature (two-state folding or multi-state folding) of the proteins. Here we developed a method, SeqRate, to predict both protein folding kinetic type (two-state versus multi-state) and real-value folding rate using sequence length, amino acid composition, contact order, contact number, and secondary structure information predicted from only protein sequence with support vector machines.
resultsWe systematically studied the contributions of individual features to folding rate prediction. On a standard benchmark dataset, the accuracy of folding kinetic type classification is 80%. The Pearson correlation coefficient and the mean absolute difference between predicted and experimental folding rates (sec-1) in the base-10 logarithmic scale are 0.81 and 0.79 for two-state protein folders, and 0.80 and 0.68 for three-state protein folders. SeqRate is the first sequence-based method for protein folding type classification and its accuracy of fold rate prediction is improved over previous sequence-based methods. Its performance can be further enhanced with additional information, such as structure-based geometric contacts, as inputs.
conclusionsBoth the web server and software of predicting folding rate are publicly available at http://casp.rnet.missouri.edu/fold_rate/index.html.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.