Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20438120›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2010

Quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis of T cell receptor signaling in diabetes prone and resistant mice.

Leo K Iwai, Christophe Benoist, Diane Mathis, Forest M White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Protein networks and activation of lymphocytes.Current opinion in immunology · 2015
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Toward quantitative phosphotyrosine profiling in vivo.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2012
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leo K IwaiDepartment of Pathology, Harvard Medical School and Section on Immunology and Immunogenetics, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Christophe Benoist
Diane Mathis
Forest M White
Harvard University · USJoslin Diabetes Center · US

Funding

TOXICOLOGY CORE UNITP30ES002109 · NIEHS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LEVINE, STUART S · 1985 to 2020
$25.6M
Proteomics of central tolerance in NOD vs B6 miceR33AI065354 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI WHITE, FOREST M · 2006 to 2008
$1.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R33 AI 065354NIAID NIH HHS R33 AI065354NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES002109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type 1 diabetes, in human patients and NOD mice, results from an immune attack on insulin-producing beta-cells of the pancreas by autoreactive T lymphocytes. In NOD mice, genetically controlled perturbations in the signaling pathways downstream of the antigen-specific T cell receptor (TCR) may be instrumental in the altered responses of T cells, manifest as inefficient induction of apoptosis after recognition of self-antigens in the thymus or as perturbed reactivity of mature T cells in peripheral organs. To map this signaling difference(s), we have used mass spectrometry-based quantitative phosphoproteomics to compare the activation of primary CD4(+) T cells of diabetes-prone NOD and -resistant B6.H2g7 mice. Immunoprecipitation and IMAC purification of tyrosine-phosphorylated peptides, combined with a stable-isotope iTRAQ labeling, enabled us to identify and quantify over 77 phosphorylation events in 54 different proteins downstream of TCR stimulation of primary CD4(+) T cells. This analysis showed a generally higher level of phosphotyrosine in activated NOD cells, as well as several phosphorylation sites that appeared to be differentially regulated in these two strains (involving TXK, CD5, PAG1, and ZAP-70). These data highlight the differences in signaling between CD4(+) T cell compartments of NOD and B6g7 mice and may underlie the dysregulation of T cells in NOD mice.

Indexed as

AnimalsCD3 ComplexCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCluster AnalysisDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleLymph NodesMiceMice, Inbred NODPhosphoproteinsPhosphorylationPhosphotyrosineProteomicsReceptors, Antigen, T-CellSignal TransductionTandem Mass SpectrometryCD3 ComplexPhosphoproteinsPhosphotyrosineReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID20438120
PMCPMC3603002
OpenAlexW2072689265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.