Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20437978›Full record

ArticleClinical medicine (London, England)2010

Intermediate care for older people in the U.K.

Henry J Woodford, James George

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Improved outcomes for elderly patients who received care on a transitional care unit.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2014
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Henry J WoodfordCumberland Infirmary, Carlisle, Cumbria. henry.woodford@ncumbria-acute.nhs.uk
James George

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intermediate care (IC) has been government policy for implementation in the U.K. for almost 10 years. It was hoped that it would help free up acute hospital resources. However, admission rates continue to rise and are rising fastest in those over the age of 75. Many different models of IC have been tried. Typically, outcomes are very similar to traditional hospital care and they tend to be met with high patient satisfaction. Yet there is no evidence that they reduce acute hospital use or that they are cost efficient. Maybe it is time to rethink our national strategy on this issue?

Indexed as

Intermediate Care FacilitiesResidential FacilitiesAgedAged, 80 and overCase ManagementHome Care Services, Hospital-BasedHospitalizationHumansNational Health ProgramsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID20437978
PMCPMC4952079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.