ArticleAnnals of neurology2010
Specific immunotherapy of experimental myasthenia gravis by a novel mechanism.
Article in Annals of neurology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Myasthenia gravis: the future is here.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024Review
- Autoantibody Specificities in Myasthenia Gravis; Implications for Improved Diagnostics and Therapeutics.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
- Advances in autoimmune myasthenia gravis management.Expert review of neurotherapeutics · 2018Review
- Mechanisms of Autoantibody-Induced Pathology.Frontiers in immunology · 2017Review
- A Sensitive Method for Detecting Peptide-specific CD4Frontiers in immunology · 2017Article
- Critical Differences between Induced and Spontaneous Mouse Models of Graves' Disease with Implications for Antigen-Specific Immunotherapy in Humans.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2016Article
- Antigen-specific immunotherapeutic vaccine for experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2014Article
- Myasthenogenicity of the main immunogenic region.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2012Article
- Myasthenogenicity of the main immunogenic region and endogenous muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.Autoimmunity · 2012Article
- A comparison of epitope repertoires associated with myasthenia gravis in humans and nonhuman hosts.Autoimmune diseases · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveMyasthenia gravis (MG) and its animal model, experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis (EAMG), are antibody (Ab)-mediated autoimmune diseases, in which autoantibodies bind to and cause loss of muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) at the neuromuscular junction. To develop a specific immunotherapy of MG, we treated rats with ongoing EAMG by intraperitoneal injection of bacterially-expressed human muscle AChR constructs.
methodsRats with ongoing EAMG received intraperitoneal treatment with the constructs weekly for 5 weeks beginning after the acute phase. Autoantibody concentration, subclassification, and specificity were analyzed to address the underlying therapeutic mechanism.
resultsEAMG was specifically suppressed by diverting autoantibody production away from pathologically relevant specificities directed at epitopes on the extracellular surface of muscle AChRs toward pathologically irrelevant epitopes on the cytoplasmic domain. A mixture of subunit cytoplasmic domains was more effective than a mixture containing both extracellular and cytoplasmic domains or than only the extracellular domain of alpha1 subunits.
interpretationTherapy using only cytoplasmic domains, which lack pathologically relevant epitopes, avoids the potential liability of boosting the pathological response. Use of a mixture of bacterially-expressed human muscle AChR cytoplasmic domains for antigen-specific immunosuppression of myasthenia gravis has the potential to be specific, robust, and safe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.