Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20437305›Full record

ArticleWomen & health2010

Questioning our questions: do frequently asked questions adequately cover the aspects of women's lives most affected by abnormal uterine bleeding? Opinions of women with abnormal uterine bleeding participating in focus group discussions.

Kristen A Matteson, Melissa A Clark

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women & health, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Niche-related outcomes after caesarean section and quality of life: a focus group study and review of literature.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. What have we learned about the patient's experience of von Willebrand disease? A focus on women.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Menstruation: science and society.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Diagnosis of heavy menstrual bleeding.Women's health (London, England) · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristen A MattesonDivision of Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Infants Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02905-2401, USA. KMatteson@CareNE.org
Melissa A Clark
Brown University · US

Funding

Brown/WIH Women's Reproductive Health Research Career Development ProgramK12HD050108 · NICHD · WOMEN AND INFANTS HOSPITAL-RHODE ISLAND · PI HAMPTON, BRITTANY STAR · 2005 to 2019
$4.1M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD050108NICHD NIH HHS K12-HD050108-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives of this article are: (1) to explore the effects on women's lives by heavy or irregular menstrual bleeding; and (2) to examine whether aspects of women's lives most affected by heavy or irregular menstrual bleeding were adequately addressed by questions that are frequently used in clinical encounters and available questionnaires. We conducted four focus group sessions with a total of 25 English-speaking women who had reported abnormal uterine bleeding. Discussions included open-ended questions that pertained to bleeding, aspects of life affected by bleeding, and questions frequently used in clinical settings about bleeding and quality of life. We identified five themes that reflected how women's lives were affected by heavy or irregular menstrual bleeding: irritation/inconvenience, bleeding-associated pain, self-consciousness about odor, social embarrassment, and ritual-like behavior. Although women responded that the frequently used questions about bleeding and quality of life were important, they felt that the questions failed to go into enough depth to adequately characterize their experiences. Based on the themes identified in our focus group sessions, clinicians and researchers may need to change the questions used to capture "patient experience" with abnormal uterine bleeding more accurately.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMenorrhagiaMenstruationMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSickness Impact ProfileStress, PsychologicalYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID20437305
PMCPMC2884378
OpenAlexW1993298524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.