Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20437120›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2010

Update on biomarkers in psoriatic arthritis.

Vinod Chandran, Dafna D Gladman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Increased frequency of activated CD8Scientific reports · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Biomarkers in psoriatic arthritis: recent progress.Current rheumatology reports · 2014
    Review
  7. Article
  8. How can psoriatic arthritis be diagnosed early?Current rheumatology reports · 2012
    Article
  9. [Psoriasis arthritis. An interdisciplinary challenge].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2011
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vinod ChandranDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Centre for Prognosis Studies in Rheumatic Diseases, Toronto Western Hospital, 399 Bathurst Street, 1E-410B, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada.
Dafna D Gladman

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomarkers in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) may serve as surrogate end points for disease outcome and can provide insights into disease susceptibility and natural history. Biomarkers could relate to diagnosis, pathogenesis, prognosis, therapeutic response, and comorbidities. The "felt need" is, however, in the development of biomarkers for the presence of PsA in patients with psoriasis, as well as that for joint damage. During the past few years, many studies related to PsA biomarkers have been conducted. These studies are reviewed here. C-reactive protein, matrix metalloproteinase-3, and circulating osteoclast precursors show promise. An international goal-directed study to determine biomarkers for joint damage in PsA is now under way through a collaborative effort of GRAPPA (the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis) and OMERACT (Outcome Measures for Rheumatology Clinical Trials).

Indexed as

C-Reactive ProteinArthritis, PsoriaticBiomarkersHumansMatrix Metalloproteinase 3OsteoclastsBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinMatrix Metalloproteinase 3

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.