Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20437115›Full record

ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2010

Gemcitabine and other new cytotoxic drugs: will any find their way into primary therapy?

David W Dougherty, Jonathan W Friedberg

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David W DoughertyJames P. Wilmot Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 704, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Jonathan W Friedberg
University of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

SPORE in LymphomaP50CA130805 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI BERNSTEIN, STEVEN H · 2008 to 2012
$11.7M
NCI NIH HHS CA-130805
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary treatment for classic Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) remains highly effective with chemotherapy alone or combined-modality therapy. The limitations of therapy have been related to toxicity and efficacy in subsets of patients. The introduction of a number of new and novel cytotoxic agents has provided opportunities for investigating their use in the treatment of HL. This article briefly reviews current primary treatment strategies for HL and examines the existing data for both new cytotoxic agents and other selected novel agents in the treatment of HL.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntineoplastic AgentsBendamustine HydrochlorideClinical Trials as TopicCombined Modality TherapyDeoxycytidineGemcitabineHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHodgkin DiseaseHumansLenalidomideNitrogen Mustard CompoundsRituximabThalidomideVinblastineAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntineoplastic AgentsBendamustine HydrochlorideDeoxycytidineGemcitabineHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsLenalidomideNitrogen Mustard CompoundsRituximabThalidomideVinblastineVinorelbine

Identifiers

PMID20437115
OpenAlexW2094842743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.