Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20436961›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2010

The effect of rural-to-urban migration on obesity and diabetes in India: a cross-sectional study.

Shah Ebrahim, Sanjay Kinra, Liza Bowen, Elizabeth Andersen, Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Tanica Lyngdoh, Lakshmy Ramakrishnan, R C Ahuja, Prashant Joshi, S Mohan Das and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 186 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
186citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
36.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

186 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 336 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

126 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Shah EbrahimDepartment of Epidemiology & Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. shah.ebrahim@lshtm.ac.uk
Sanjay Kinra
Liza Bowen
Elizabeth Andersen
Yoav Ben-Shlomo
Tanica Lyngdoh
Lakshmy Ramakrishnan
R C Ahuja
Prashant Joshi
S Mohan Das
Murali Mohan
George Davey Smith
Dorairaj Prabhakaran
K Srinath Reddy
Indian Migration Study group
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBPublic Health Foundation of India · INUniversity of Bristol · GBAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INCentre for Chronic Disease Control · INGovernment Medical College · INKing George's Medical University · INKrishna Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

Medical Research Council G0600705Wellcome Trust 084674Wellcome Trust GR070797MF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMigration from rural areas of India contributes to urbanisation and may increase the risk of obesity and diabetes. We tested the hypotheses that rural-to-urban migrants have a higher prevalence of obesity and diabetes than rural nonmigrants, that migrants would have an intermediate prevalence of obesity and diabetes compared with life-long urban and rural dwellers, and that longer time since migration would be associated with a higher prevalence of obesity and of diabetes. METHODS AND

findingsThe place of origin of people working in factories in north, central, and south India was identified. Migrants of rural origin, their rural dwelling sibs, and those of urban origin together with their urban dwelling sibs were assessed by interview, examination, and fasting blood samples. Obesity, diabetes, and other cardiovascular risk factors were compared. A total of 6,510 participants (42% women) were recruited. Among urban, migrant, and rural men the age- and factory-adjusted percentages classified as obese (body mass index [BMI] >25 kg/m(2)) were 41.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 39.1-44.7), 37.8% (95% CI 35.0-40.6), and 19.0% (95% CI 17.0-21.0), respectively, and as diabetic were 13.5% (95% CI 11.6-15.4), 14.3% (95% CI 12.2-16.4), and 6.2% (95% CI 5.0-7.4), respectively. Findings for women showed similar patterns. Rural men had lower blood pressure, lipids, and fasting blood glucose than urban and migrant men, whereas no differences were seen in women. Among migrant men, but not women, there was weak evidence for a lower prevalence of both diabetes and obesity among more recent (</=10 y) migrants.

conclusionsMigration into urban areas is associated with increases in obesity, which drive other risk factor changes. Migrants have adopted modes of life that put them at similar risk to the urban population. Gender differences in some risk factors by place of origin are unexpected and require further exploration. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.

Indexed as

Population DynamicsAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes MellitusFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedObesityRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID20436961
PMCPMC2860494
OpenAlexW2170768690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.