ArticleHealthcare policy = Politiques de sante2009
Breadth, Depth and Agreement among Provincial Formularies in Canada.
Article in Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Data-Related and Methodological Challenges in Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Traditional and Genomic Newborn Screening Programs.Applied health economics and health policy · 2026Review
- Emergency contraception subsidy in Canada: a comparative policy analysis.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- An Exploratory Analysis of Predictors of Concordance between Canadian Common Drug Review Reimbursement Recommendations and the Subsequent Decisions by Ontario, British Columbia and Alberta.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2020Article
- Prescription drug coverage in Canada: a review of the economic, policy and political considerations for universal pharmacare.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2018Review
- Stitching the gaps in the Canadian public drug coverage patchwork?: a review of provincial pharmacare policy changes from 2000 to 2010.Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2012Article
- Financial burden of household out-of-pocket expenditures for prescription drugs: cross-sectional analysis based on national survey data.Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal · 2011Article
- A comparison of drug coverage in alberta before and after the introduction of the national common drug review process.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2010Article
- Listening for prescriptions: a national consultation on pharmaceutical policy issues.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2010Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies have concluded that there is significant variation in drug coverage across Canadian provinces because conventional measures of inter-rater reliability for formulary listings are low. We sought to investigate whether conventional methods are appropriate for formulary concordance measurement by testing the hypotheses that (a) conventionally measured variations in provincial formularies are driven by disagreement over large numbers of drugs that represent very small segments of the market and (b) patterns in coverage levels and agreement across therapeutic categories might provide evidence of "potentially legitimate" variation in provincial formularies.
methodsWe studied December 2006 formulary listings for general pharmacare programs in all but the smallest Canadian province. We characterized formularies in terms of the simple percentage of all available drugs that were listed on them and by a similar percentage that weighted each drug by its total national retail sales during 2006. We measured agreement among formularies using conventional inter-rater reliability scores (Kappa statistics) and a simple coverage-agreement measure.
resultsProvincial formularies studied here listed between 55% and 73% of the 796 drugs analyzed. When formulary listings were weighted by national retail sales, the measure of formulary coverage exceeded 86% in all provinces studied. Conventional inter-rater reliability scores (Kappa statistics) indicate that coverage agreement among most provincial formularies was low to moderate; however, drugs that were listed on all nine provincial formularies studied accounted for 77% of total retail spending in Canada. When analyzed by therapeutic category, the extent of coverage offered was relatively consistent across provinces in all but three leading categories: anti-migraine drugs, anti-dementia drugs and sedatives.
conclusionWhile variations in coverage for specific drug classes and drug products remain important areas for investigation and policy consideration, Canada is currently operating with a significant "implicit national formulary" by way of the fact that provincial formularies independently yet mutually list most of the top-selling medicines in the marketplace.
Identifiers
20436800PMC2700711What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.