Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20436269›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2010

Enhancing therapeutic efficacy by targeting non-oncogene addicted cells with combinations of signal transduction inhibitors and chemotherapy.

Stephen L Abrams, Linda S Steelman, John G Shelton, William Chappell, Jörg Bäsecke, Franca Stivala, Marco Donia, Ferdinando Nicoletti, Massimo Libra, Alberto M Martelli and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Signaling pathways as therapeutic targets in biliary tract cancer.Expert opinion on therapeutic targets · 2017
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Potential biomarkers for paclitaxel sensitivity in hypopharynx cancer cell.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2013
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Stephen L AbramsDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
Linda S Steelman
John G Shelton
William Chappell
Jörg Bäsecke
Franca Stivala
Marco Donia
Ferdinando Nicoletti
Massimo Libra
Alberto M Martelli
James A McCubrey
Greenville College · USUniversity of Catania · ITEast Carolina University · USIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bologna · ITUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

Ras/Raf &PI3K/Akt Induced Breast Cancer Drug ResistanceR01CA098195 · NCI · EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY · PI MC CUBREY, JAMES A · 2003 to 2007
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA098195NCI NIH HHS R01CA098195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of inhibition of the Raf/MEK/ERK and PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathways and chemotherapeutic drugs on cell cycle progression and drug sensitivity were examined in cytokine-dependent FL5.12 hematopoietic cells. We examined their effects, as these cells resemble normal hematopoietic precursor cells as they do not exhibit "oncogene-addicted" growth, while they do display "cytokine-addicted" proliferation as cytokine removal resulted in apoptosis in greater than 80% of the cells within 48 hrs. When cytokine-dependent FL5.12 cells were cultured in the presence of IL-3, which stimulated multiple proliferation and anti-apoptotic cascades, MEK, PI3K and mTOR inhibitors transiently suppressed but did not totally inhibit cell cycle progression or induce apoptosis while chemotherapeutic drugs such as doxorubicin and paclitaxel were more effective in inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Doxorubicin induced a G(1) block, while paclitaxel triggered a G(2)/M block. Doxorubicin was more effective in inducing cell death than paclitaxel. Furthermore the effects of doxorubicin could be enhanced by addition of MEK, PI3K or mTOR inhibitors. Cytokine-dependent cells which proliferate in vitro and are not "oncogene-addicted" may represent a pre-malignant stage, more refractory to treatment with targeted therapy. However, these cells are sensitive to chemotherapeutic drugs. It is important to develop methods to inhibit the growth of such cytokine-dependent cells as they may resemble the leukemia stem cell and other cancer initiating cells. These results demonstrate the enhanced effectiveness of targeting early hematopoietic progenitor cells with combinations of chemotherapeutic drugs and signal transduction inhibitors.

Indexed as

Phosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsAnimalsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisButadienesCell Line, TumorChromonesDoxorubicinG1 PhaseInterleukin-3Intracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsLeukemia, ProlymphocyticMiceMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesMorpholines2-(4-morpholinyl)-8-phenyl-4H-1-benzopyran-4-oneAntibiotics, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic AgentsButadienesChromonesDoxorubicinInterleukin-3Intracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesMorpholinesmTOR protein, mouseNitrilesPaclitaxelPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPhosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSirolimusTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesU 0126

Identifiers

PMID20436269
PMCPMC3781183
OpenAlexW2072730864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.