Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20436046›Full record

Trial reportEuropean heart journal2010

Dronedarone in patients with congestive heart failure: insights from ATHENA.

Stefan H Hohnloser, Harry J G M Crijns, Martin van Eickels, Christophe Gaudin, Richard L Page, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Stuart J Connolly, ATHENA Investigators

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European heart journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Atrial fibrillation and its pernicious role in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a new frontier in interventional electrophysiology.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Post-ATHENA and beyond.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2011
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. [Dronedarone].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2010
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Stefan H HohnloserDivision of Clinical Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, J. W. Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, D 60590 Frankfurt, Germany. Hohnloser@em.uni-frankfurt.de
Harry J G M Crijns
Martin van Eickels
Christophe Gaudin
Richard L Page
Christian Torp-Pedersen
Stuart J Connolly
ATHENA Investigators
Sanofi (Germany) · DEMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLMcMaster University · CAUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DEUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsDronedarone is a new multichannel blocking antiarrhythmic drug for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). In patients with recently decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF) and depressed LV function, the drug was associated with excess mortality compared with a placebo group. The present study aimed to analyse in detail the effects of dronedarone on mortality and morbidity in AF patients CHF. METHODS AND

resultsWe performed a post hoc analysis of ATHENA, a large placebo-controlled outcome trial in 4628 patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF, to evaluate the relationship between clinical outcomes and dronedarone therapy in patients with stable CHF. The primary outcome was time to first cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization or death. There were 209 patients with NYHA class II/III CHF and a left ventricular ejection fraction < or =0.40 at baseline (114 placebo, 95 dronedarone patients). A primary outcome event occurred in 59/114 placebo patients compared with 42/95 dronedarone patients [hazard ratio (HR) 0.78, 95% CI = 0.52-1.16]. Twenty of 114 placebo patients and 12/95 dronedarone patients died during the study (HR 0.71, 95% CI = 0.34-1.44). Fifty-four placebo and 42 dronedarone patients were hospitalized for an intermittent episode of NYHA class IV CHF (HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.52-1.17).

conclusionIn this post-hoc analysis of ATHENA patients with AF and stable CHF, dronedarone did not increase mortality and showed a reduction of CV hospitalization or death similar to the overall population. However, in the light of the ANtiarrhythmic trial with DROnedarone in Moderate to severe CHF Evaluating morbidity DecreAse study, dronedarone should be contraindicated in patients with NYHA class IV or unstable NYHA classes II and III CHF.

Indexed as

AgedAmiodaroneAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsAtrial FibrillationCreatinineDronedaroneFemaleHeart FailureHospitalizationHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleTreatment OutcomeVentricular Dysfunction, LeftAmiodaroneAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsCreatinineDronedarone

Identifiers

PMID20436046
PMCPMC2903712
OpenAlexW2113512054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.