Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20435671›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2010

Genome-wide assessment of differential roles for p300 and CBP in transcription regulation.

Yolande F M Ramos, Matthew S Hestand, Matty Verlaan, Elise Krabbendam, Yavuz Ariyurek, Michiel van Galen, Hans van Dam, Gert-Jan B van Ommen, Johan T den Dunnen, Alt Zantema and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. From developmental origins to relapse: molecular and therapeutic insights in medulloblastoma.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yolande F M RamosDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Postzone S4-0P, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands. y.f.m.ramos@lumc.nl
Matthew S Hestand
Matty Verlaan
Elise Krabbendam
Yavuz Ariyurek
Michiel van Galen
Hans van Dam
Gert-Jan B van Ommen
Johan T den Dunnen
Alt Zantema
Peter A C 't Hoen
Leiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite high levels of homology, transcription coactivators p300 and CREB binding protein (CBP) are both indispensable during embryogenesis. They are largely known to regulate the same genes. To identify genes preferentially regulated by p300 or CBP, we performed an extensive genome-wide survey using the ChIP-seq on cell-cycle synchronized cells. We found that 57% of the tags were within genes or proximal promoters, with an overall preference for binding to transcription start and end sites. The heterogeneous binding patterns possibly reflect the divergent roles of CBP and p300 in transcriptional regulation. Most of the 16 103 genes were bound by both CBP and p300. However, after stimulation 89 and 1944 genes were preferentially bound by CBP or p300, respectively. Target genes were found to be primarily involved in the regulation of metabolic and developmental processes, and transcription, with CBP showing a stronger preference than p300 for genes active in negative regulation of transcription. Analysis of transcription factor binding sites suggest that CBP and p300 have many partners in common, but AP-1 and Serum Response Factor (SRF) appear to be more prominent in CBP-specific sequences, whereas AP-2 and SP1 are enriched in p300-specific targets. Taken together, our findings further elucidate the distinct roles of coactivators p300 and CBP in transcriptional regulation.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationTranscription, GeneticBase SequenceBinding SitesCell Line, TumorChromatin ImmunoprecipitationConsensus SequenceCREB-Binding ProteinE1A-Associated p300 ProteinGenome, HumanHumansPromoter Regions, GeneticReproducibility of ResultsSequence Analysis, DNACREB-Binding ProteinE1A-Associated p300 Protein

Identifiers

PMID20435671
PMCPMC2938195
OpenAlexW2059044416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.