ArticleLancet (London, England)2010
Clinical assessment incorporating a personal genome.
Article in Lancet (London, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 317 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
317 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 676 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Review of Polygenic Risk Scores for Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Pooled it
- Socioeconomic position and use of healthcare in the last year of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Influence of pharmacogenomic profiling prior to pharmaceutical treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer on cost effectiveness : a systematic review.PharmacoEconomics · 2013Pooled it
- Impact of the CYP4F2 p.V433M polymorphism on coumarin dose requirement: systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2012Pooled it
- Evolutionary meta-analysis of association studies reveals ancient constraints affecting disease marker discovery.Molecular biology and evolution · 2012Pooled it
- Combining Clinical and Polygenic Risk Improves Stroke Prediction Among Individuals With Atrial Fibrillation.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2021Trial
- Article
- Article
- Deciphering host-virus interaction networks in ALV infection: an integrative multi-omics perspective.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Learning-based parallel acceleration for HaplotypeCaller.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- A newly identified pathology of episodic angioedema with hypereosinophilia (Gleich syndrome) revealed by nultiomics analysis.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2025Article
- Article
- Fast and accurate DNASeq variant calling workflow composed of LUSH toolkit.Human genomics · 2024Article
- Review
- Immunoblot Analysis from Single Cells Using Milo™ Single-Cell Western Platform.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Multi-arm covariate-adaptive randomization.Science China. Mathematics · 2023Article
- Article
- Different perspectives on translational genomics in personalized medicineJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2022Article
- Identification of a pleiotropic effect of ADIPOQ on cardiac dysfunction and Alzheimer's disease based on genetic evidence and health care records.Translational psychiatry · 2022Article
- Accelerated identification of disease-causing variants with ultra-rapid nanopore genome sequencing.Nature biotechnology · 2022Article
257 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
31 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe cost of genomic information has fallen steeply, but the clinical translation of genetic risk estimates remains unclear. We aimed to undertake an integrated analysis of a complete human genome in a clinical context.
methodsWe assessed a patient with a family history of vascular disease and early sudden death. Clinical assessment included analysis of this patient's full genome sequence, risk prediction for coronary artery disease, screening for causes of sudden cardiac death, and genetic counselling. Genetic analysis included the development of novel methods for the integration of whole genome and clinical risk. Disease and risk analysis focused on prediction of genetic risk of variants associated with mendelian disease, recognised drug responses, and pathogenicity for novel variants. We queried disease-specific mutation databases and pharmacogenomics databases to identify genes and mutations with known associations with disease and drug response. We estimated post-test probabilities of disease by applying likelihood ratios derived from integration of multiple common variants to age-appropriate and sex-appropriate pre-test probabilities. We also accounted for gene-environment interactions and conditionally dependent risks.
findingsAnalysis of 2.6 million single nucleotide polymorphisms and 752 copy number variations showed increased genetic risk for myocardial infarction, type 2 diabetes, and some cancers. We discovered rare variants in three genes that are clinically associated with sudden cardiac death-TMEM43, DSP, and MYBPC3. A variant in LPA was consistent with a family history of coronary artery disease. The patient had a heterozygous null mutation in CYP2C19 suggesting probable clopidogrel resistance, several variants associated with a positive response to lipid-lowering therapy, and variants in CYP4F2 and VKORC1 that suggest he might have a low initial dosing requirement for warfarin. Many variants of uncertain importance were reported.
interpretationAlthough challenges remain, our results suggest that whole-genome sequencing can yield useful and clinically relevant information for individual patients.
fundingNational Institute of General Medical Sciences; National Heart, Lung And Blood Institute; National Human Genome Research Institute; Howard Hughes Medical Institute; National Library of Medicine, Lucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health; Hewlett Packard Foundation; Breetwor Family Foundation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.