Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20434563›Full record

ReviewMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2010

DNA methylation profiling using HpaII tiny fragment enrichment by ligation-mediated PCR (HELP).

Masako Suzuki, John M Greally

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Intrauterine Programming of Diabetes Induced Cardiac Embryopathy.Diabetes & obesity international journal · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Anticancer activity of green tea polyphenols in prostate gland.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2012
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Advances in epigenetics and epigenomics for neurodegenerative diseases.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2011
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Masako SuzukiCenter for Epigenomics and Division of Computational Genetics, Department of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1301 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
John M Greally

Funding

Massively-parallel sequencing technology for the epigenomeR01HG004401 · NHGRI · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI GREALLY, JOHN · 2007 to 2009
$1.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The HELP assay is a technique that allows genome-wide analysis of cytosine methylation. Here we describe the assay, its relative strengths and weaknesses, and the transition of the assay from a microarray to massively-parallel sequencing-based foundation.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationAnimalsDeoxyribonuclease HpaIIDNAHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionDeoxyribonuclease HpaIIDNA

Identifiers

PMID20434563
PMCPMC2954265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.