Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20434203›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2010

What targeting eosinophils has taught us about their role in diseases.

Bruce S Bochner, Gerald J Gleich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Eosinophils: A Friend or Foe in Human Health and Diseases.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Diagnosis and Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis.Immunology and allergy clinics of North America · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Eosinophils, galectins, and a reason to breathe.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Eosinophilic Skin Diseases: A Comprehensive Review.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2016
    Review
  17. Novel Therapies for Eosinophilic Disorders.Immunology and allergy clinics of North America · 2015
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Determinants of eosinophil survival and apoptotic cell death.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bruce S BochnerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. bbochner@jhmi.edu
Gerald J Gleich
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Targeting Siglec-8/Siglec-F Reduce Allergic Responses In Vitro and In VivoR01AI072265 · NIAID · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BOCHNER, BRUCE S · 2007 to 2017
$3.9M
Targeting Siglec-8/-F to treat eosinophil and mast cell related disordersR56AI072265 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOCHNER, BRUCE S · 2012 to 2012
$405k
NIAID NIH HHS AI072265NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI072265NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI072265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eosinophil-associated disease is a term used to encompass a range of disorders from hypereosinophilic syndrome to asthma. Despite the longstanding belief that eosinophils can be primary contributors to disease pathophysiology, it is only in recent years that direct and selective reduction or elimination of eosinophils can be achieved in animals or human subjects. These developments have been made possible in mice through clever targeting of eosinophil production. Antibodies and other agents that target soluble eosinophil-related molecules, such as IL-5, or cell-surface structures, such as CCR3, have also proved useful in reducing blood and tissue eosinophil counts. In human subjects the only eosinophil-selective agents tested in clinical trials thus far are neutralizing antibodies to IL-5, with promising but mixed results. At the very least, such forms of pharmacologic hypothesis testing of the role of eosinophils in certain airway, gastrointestinal, and hematologic diseases has finally provided us with new insights into disease pathogenesis. At its optimistic best, these and other targeted agents might someday become available for those afflicted with eosinophil-associated disorders. This review summarizes what has been learned in vivo in both preclinical and clinical studies of eosinophil-directed therapies, with an emphasis on recent advances.

Indexed as

AnimalsAsthmaCell Adhesion MoleculesCell MovementCell SurvivalChurg-Strauss SyndromeDisease Models, AnimalEosinophilsHematopoiesisHumansHypereosinophilic SyndromeImmunoglobulinsIntercellular Adhesion Molecule-1Interleukin-5MucoproteinsVascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1Cell Adhesion MoleculesImmunoglobulinsIntercellular Adhesion Molecule-1Interleukin-5MADCAM1 protein, humanMucoproteinsVascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1

Identifiers

PMID20434203
PMCPMC2902581
OpenAlexW2100990833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.