Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20433850›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2010

Consensus protein design without phylogenetic bias.

Christian Jäckel, Jesse D Bloom, Peter Kast, Frances H Arnold, Donald Hilvert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Protein Engineering Approaches to Enhance Fungal Laccase Production inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Consensus Design of an Evolved High-Redox Potential Laccase.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Monomerization of far-red fluorescent proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christian JäckelLaboratory of Organic Chemistry, ETH Zurich, Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 10, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
Jesse D Bloom
Peter Kast
Frances H Arnold
Donald Hilvert

Funding

Synthetic Protein Families by Structure-Guided SCHEMA RecombinationR01GM068664 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ARNOLD, FRANCES H · 2003 to 2010
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM068664
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consensus design is an appealing strategy for the stabilization of proteins. It exploits amino acid conservation in sets of homologous proteins to identify likely beneficial mutations. Nevertheless, its success depends on the phylogenetic diversity of the sequence set available. Here, we show that randomization of a single protein represents a reliable alternative source of sequence diversity that is essentially free of phylogenetic bias. A small number of functional protein sequences selected from binary-patterned libraries suffice as input for the consensus design of active enzymes that are easier to produce and substantially more stable than individual members of the starting data set. Although catalytic activity correlates less consistently with sequence conservation in these extensively randomized proteins, less extreme mutagenesis strategies might be adopted in practice to augment stability while maintaining function.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceBase SequenceChorismate MutaseConsensus SequenceDNA, BacterialEnzymesEnzyme StabilityEscherichia coliModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataPeptide LibraryPhylogenyProtein ConformationProtein EngineeringProteinsProtein StabilityChorismate MutaseDNA, BacterialEnzymesPeptide LibraryProteins

Identifiers

PMID20433850
PMCPMC2904866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.