Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20433763›Full record

ArticleRespiratory research2010

Respiratory allergy to Blomia tropicalis: immune response in four syngeneic mouse strains and assessment of a low allergen-dose, short-term experimental model.

Tiana Baqueiro, Momtchilo Russo, Virgínia M G Silva, Thayna Meirelles, Pablo R S Oliveira, Eliane Gomes, Renato Barboza, Ana T Cerqueira-Lima, Camila A Figueiredo, Lain Pontes-de-Carvalho and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Potential therapeutic effect of Allium cepa L. and quercetin in a murine model of Blomia tropicalis induced asthma.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tiana BaqueiroDepartamento de Biointeração, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Av, Reitor Miguel Calmon, Canela, Salvador, Bahia, CEP 40110902, Brasil.
Momtchilo Russo
Virgínia M G Silva
Thayna Meirelles
Pablo R S Oliveira
Eliane Gomes
Renato Barboza
Ana T Cerqueira-Lima
Camila A Figueiredo
Lain Pontes-de-Carvalho
Neuza M Alcântara-Neves
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRInstituto Butantan · BR

Funding

Wellcome Trust 072405/Z/03/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe dust mite Blomia tropicalis is an important source of aeroallergens in tropical areas. Although a mouse model for B. tropicalis extract (BtE)-induced asthma has been described, no study comparing different mouse strains in this asthma model has been reported. The relevance and reproducibility of experimental animal models of allergy depends on the genetic background of the animal, the molecular composition of the allergen and the experimental protocol.

objectivesThis work had two objectives. The first was to study the anti-B. tropicalis allergic responses in different mouse strains using a short-term model of respiratory allergy to BtE. This study included the comparison of the allergic responses elicited by BtE with those elicited by ovalbumin in mice of the strain that responded better to BtE sensitization. The second objective was to investigate whether the best responder mouse strain could be used in an experimental model of allergy employing relatively low BtE doses.

methodsGroups of mice of four different syngeneic strains were sensitized subcutaneously with 100 microg of BtE on days 0 and 7 and challenged four times intranasally, at days 8, 10, 12, and 14, with 10 microg of BtE. A/J mice, that were the best responders to BtE sensitization, were used to compare the B. tropicalis-specific asthma experimental model with the conventional experimental model of ovalbumin (OVA)-specific asthma. A/J mice were also sensitized with a lower dose of BtE.

resultsMice of all strains had lung inflammatory-cell infiltration and increased levels of anti-BtE IgE antibodies, but these responses were significantly more intense in A/J mice than in CBA/J, BALB/c or C57BL/6J mice. Immunization of A/J mice with BtE induced a more intense airway eosinophil influx, higher levels of total IgE, similar airway hyperreactivity to methacholine but less intense mucous production, and lower levels of specific IgE, IgG1 and IgG2 antibodies than sensitization with OVA. Finally, immunization with a relatively low BtE dose (10 microg per subcutaneous injection per mouse) was able to sensitize A/J mice, which were the best responders to high-dose BtE immunization, for the development of allergy-associated immune and lung inflammatory responses.

conclusionsThe described short-term model of BtE-induced allergic lung disease is reproducible in different syngeneic mouse strains, and mice of the A/J strain was the most responsive to it. In addition, it was shown that OVA and BtE induce quantitatively different immune responses in A/J mice and that the experimental model can be set up with low amounts of BtE.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAllergensAnimalsAntigens, PlantAsthmaBronchial HyperreactivityBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, ImmunologicImmunoglobulin EInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLallergen Blo t 5AllergensAntigens, PlantCytokinesImmunoglobulin EOvalbumin

Identifiers

PMID20433763
PMCPMC2890645
OpenAlexW2163728314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.